Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Computer Security | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Information Security | 2 |
| Program Effectiveness | 2 |
| Asynchronous Communication | 1 |
| Bullying | 1 |
| COVID-19 | 1 |
| Computer Mediated… | 1 |
| Criticism | 1 |
| Data Collection | 1 |
| Ethics | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Adorjan, Michael | 1 |
| Christine Wildman | 1 |
| Mavis Morton | 1 |
| Paula C. Barata | 1 |
| Ricciardelli, Rosemary | 1 |
| Tanja Samardzic | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| High Schools | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Canada | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkTanja Samardzic; Christine Wildman; Paula C. Barata; Mavis Morton – International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2024
In response to concerns about the use of online focus groups, particularly around sensitive topics research, we provide two case examples of sensitive topics research that pivoted to online focus groups amid university ethics restrictions due to COVID-19 concerns. We begin by contextualizing the studies, one of which used the more traditional…
Descriptors: Focus Groups, Videoconferencing, Young Adults, Foreign Countries
Adorjan, Michael; Ricciardelli, Rosemary – Learning, Media and Technology, 2019
While previous research identifies skepticism and some animosity among students towards school-based cyber-safety programs, drawing from focus group discussions with Canadian teens, this paper contributes to unpacking reasons for both support for 'what works' and antagonism for what is perceived to be lacking. Our findings reveal support for…
Descriptors: Information Security, Computer Security, Criticism, High School Students
