NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 10 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yin, Hongbiao – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2023
With a sample of 4,646 undergraduate students from four universities in China, this study examined the psychometric qualities of a newly-adapted measurement, namely, the Online Motivation and Engagement Scale for university and college students, and investigated the characteristics of and differences in Chinese students' motivation and engagement…
Descriptors: Learner Engagement, Online Courses, Educational Technology, COVID-19
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dong, Zhe; Gao, Ying; Schunn, Christian D. – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2023
Peer feedback activities are characterized by peers performing both roles of feedback provider and receiver, and peers are found to benefit from both roles. However, in current feedback literacy studies, the emphasis has been overwhelmingly given to students' understandings, capacities and dispositions in receiving feedback, and existing student…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Assessment Literacy, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zhan, Ying – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2022
Although the importance of investigating student feedback literacy has been widely argued in the literature, a measurement instrument is still lacking. In this study, a student feedback literacy scale was developed and validated. The scale consists of six dimensions (eliciting, processing, enacting, appreciation, readiness and commitment). Five…
Descriptors: Test Construction, Test Validity, Feedback (Response), Multiple Literacies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Luo, Jiahui; Chan, Cecilia K. Y.; Zhao, Yue – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2023
Intensive research attention has focused on developing students' evaluative judgement within the higher education curriculum, but little has addressed how it can be measured. The contextual nature of evaluative judgement makes it difficult to generate an encompassing instrument, highlighting the need for situated measurement tools. Against this…
Descriptors: Engineering Education, Higher Education, Evaluative Thinking, Intercultural Communication
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kardanova, Elena; Loyalka, Prashant; Chirikov, Igor; Liu, Lydia; Li, Guirong; Wang, Huan; Enchikova, Ekaterina; Shi, Henry; Johnson, Natalie – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2016
Relatively little is known about differences in the quality of engineering education within and across countries because of the lack of valid instruments that allow for the assessment and comparison of engineering students' skill gains. The purpose of our study is to develop and validate instruments that can be used to compare student skill gains…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Educational Quality, Engineering Education, Undergraduate Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yin, Hongbiao; Lu, Genshu; Meng, Xuanyi – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2022
This paper reports two consecutive studies investigating Chinese students' course experiences of online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. With a sample of 2,894 undergraduate students from 12 universities, Study one adapted the Course Experience Questionnaire in the context of online teaching and learning, and provided some evidence…
Descriptors: Online Courses, Student Experience, COVID-19, Pandemics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zhang, Fuhui; Schunn, Christian; Li, Wentao; Long, Miyin – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2020
Although a variety of learning benefits of peer assessment have been documented, many concerns remain regarding its reliability and validity, especially for peers at early learning stages and for English as a foreign language (EFL) learners in general. Such concerns may prevent adoption of peer assessment for instruction. To help localize the…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Reliability, Validity, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Oon, Pey-Tee; Spencer, Benson; Kam, Chester Chun Seng – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2017
Student evaluations of teaching (SET) are used globally by higher education institutions for performance assessment of academic staff and evaluation of course quality. Higher education institutions commonly develop their own SETs to measure variables deemed relevant to them. However, "home-grown" SETs are rarely assessed…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance, Higher Education, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yin, Hongbiao; Lu, Genshu; Wang, Wenyan – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2014
The quality of teaching in higher education is a topic which has generated heated debate in China, though there has been a remarkable paucity of empirical research into the characteristics of teaching and learning in Chinese universities. This study examined Chinese university students' course experience and its influence on their approaches to…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Student Experience, Learning Strategies, Educational Quality
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chen, Guo-Hai; Watkins, David – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2010
This paper examines the stability and validity of a student evaluations of teaching (SET) instrument used by the administration at a university in the PR China. The SET scores for two semesters of courses taught by 435 teachers were collected. Total 388 teachers (170 males and 218 females) were also invited to fill out the 60-item NEO Five-Factor…
Descriptors: Personality Traits, Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance, Factor Analysis, Foreign Countries