Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Autism | 2 |
| Court Litigation | 2 |
| Educational Legislation | 2 |
| Equal Education | 2 |
| Individualized Education… | 2 |
| School Districts | 2 |
| Teamwork | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Access to Education | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Disabilities | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Communique | 1 |
| Exceptional Children | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Colorado | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Board of Education v Rowley | 1 |
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkTurnbull, H. Rutherford; Turnbull, Ann P.; Cooper, David H. – Exceptional Children, 2018
In this article, we analyze the Supreme Court's decision in "Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District RE-1" (2017), interpreting the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and its provisions creating a right of every student with a disability to have an appropriate education. We compare the "Endrew" decision with…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Disabilities, Educational Legislation, Federal Legislation
McKenney, Elizabeth L. W. – Communique, 2017
On March 22, 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that schools are obligated to provide more than de mimimus services for students with disabilities. The core issue in "Endrew F. v. Douglas County Schools" is how schools are to define the "A" in FAPE: What is an appropriate public education? Douglas County schools held…
Descriptors: School Districts, Educational Legislation, Autism, Individualized Education Programs
