Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
Thomas B. Fordham Institute | 1 |
Author
Bowles, Susan A. | 1 |
Churchill, Andrew M. | 1 |
Cronin, John | 1 |
Dahlin, Michael | 1 |
Effrat, Andrew | 1 |
McCahon, Donna | 1 |
McDermott, Kathryn A. | 1 |
Xiang, Yun | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 1 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Grade 6 | 1 |
Grade 7 | 1 |
Grade 8 | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Illinois | 2 |
Massachusetts | 2 |
New Jersey | 2 |
Texas | 2 |
Arizona | 1 |
California | 1 |
Colorado | 1 |
Delaware | 1 |
Florida | 1 |
Georgia | 1 |
Idaho | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Bowles, Susan A.; Churchill, Andrew M.; Effrat, Andrew; McDermott, Kathryn A. – 2002
This paper seeks to help state policymakers understand their relatively new role in improving the academic performance of local schools and districts. The first section, "Intervention Decision-Making Framework," focuses on the intervention decision making framework model, performance criteria, strategic criteria, diagnostic…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Educational Quality, Elementary Secondary Education, Government Role
Cronin, John; Dahlin, Michael; Xiang, Yun; McCahon, Donna – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states have leeway to: (1) Craft their own academic standards, select their own tests, and define…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs