Publication Date
| In 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| College Students | 2 |
| Correlation | 2 |
| Feedback (Response) | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Writing Instruction | 2 |
| Writing Processes | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Asians | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| English (Second Language) | 1 |
| Error Correction | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| Japan | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textYoshimasa Ogawa – Journal of Response to Writing, 2025
This study explored a way to help Japanese university students write longer essays while maintaining grammatical accuracy. Participants were three groups of students enrolled in a one-year EFL course in different academic years (N = 111), and the number of words they wrote in 30 minutes and the number of errors made per 100 words were compared. To…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Accuracy, Writing Evaluation
Wakabayashi, Reina – English Language Teaching, 2013
The purpose of this study is to determine which is more beneficial to improving learner writing: reviewing peer texts or one's own text. The study took place over one semester at a Japanese university with 51 students enrolled in two writing classes at two proficiency levels. The students at the lower proficiency level reviewed peer texts, while…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Scores, Student Attitudes
