Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Evaluators | 2 |
| Program Evaluation | 2 |
| Administrative Principles | 1 |
| Case Studies | 1 |
| Conflict | 1 |
| Context Effect | 1 |
| Data Collection | 1 |
| Educational Research | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Evaluation Research | 1 |
| Field Tests | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Greenseid, Lija O. | 1 |
| Holm-Hansen, Cheryl A. | 1 |
| Lawrenz, Frances | 1 |
| Mattessich, Paul W. | 1 |
| Mueller, Daniel P. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Minnesota | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkGreenseid, Lija O.; Lawrenz, Frances – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
A team at the University of Minnesota conducted the Collaboratives for Excellence in Teacher Preparation (CETP) core evaluation between 1999 and 2004. The purpose of the CETP core evaluation was to achieve consensus among CETP project leaders and project evaluators on evaluation questions; to develop, pilot, and field test evaluation instruments…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Teacher Education, Program Evaluation, Evaluators
Mattessich, Paul W.; Mueller, Daniel P.; Holm-Hansen, Cheryl A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2009
The authors tell about their heterogeneous 91 person research and evaluation unit at an operating foundation in St. Paul, Minnesota. They focus on evaluation for program improvement, one of several purposes of studies they work on. The three authors write from their different manager positions within the unit. Included are the context of the…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Program Improvement, Program Effectiveness, Research Administration
