Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Ability Grouping | 1 |
| Coding | 1 |
| Essays | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Grading | 1 |
| Group Dynamics | 1 |
| Heterogeneous Grouping | 1 |
| Homogeneous Grouping | 1 |
| Multivariate Analysis | 1 |
| Peer Evaluation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Higher Education Research and… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Netherlands | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkHuisman, Bart; Saab, Nadira; van Driel, Jan; van den Broek, Paul – Higher Education Research and Development, 2017
There does not appear to be consensus on how to optimally match students during the peer feedback process: with same-ability peers (homogeneously) or different-ability peers (heterogeneously). In fact, there appears to be no empirical evidence that either homogeneous or heterogeneous student matching has any direct effect on writing performance.…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Peer Evaluation, Undergraduate Students, Quasiexperimental Design
