Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Decision Making | 3 |
| Foreign Countries | 3 |
| Research Projects | 3 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| College Administration | 1 |
| College Seniors | 1 |
| Committees | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Conformity | 1 |
| Democratic Values | 1 |
| Departments | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Acherman, Hans A. | 1 |
| Agricola, Bas T. | 1 |
| Prins, Frans J. | 1 |
| Van de Kaa, Dirk J. | 1 |
| van Tartwijk, Jan | 1 |
| van der Schaaf, Marieke F. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Netherlands | 3 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkAgricola, Bas T.; Prins, Frans J.; van der Schaaf, Marieke F.; van Tartwijk, Jan – Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 2021
Diagnosing teachers are teachers who perceive diagnostic information about students' learning process, interpret these aspects, decide how to respond, and act based on this diagnostic decision. During supervision meetings about the undergraduate thesis supervisors make in-the-moment decisions while interacting with their students. We regarded…
Descriptors: Supervisors, Supervision, Teacher Student Relationship, Student Attitudes
Acherman, Hans A. – International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education, 1984
The Netherlands' use of an ad hoc interinstitutional committee of university board members during a period of retrenchment is described which resulted in a plan to close a number of university departments and to terminate many small and not very successful research programs. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Administration, Committees, Decision Making, Departments
Peer reviewedVan de Kaa, Dirk J. – Higher Education, 1994
It is suggested that, in the Netherlands' system of resource allocation for research, there is subtle and powerful pressure for consensus. Changes in science policy orientation since the 1960s are traced, and the current framework for policy formation, planning, and decision making is sketched. Three peer review models are examined. (MSE)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Conformity, Decision Making, Democratic Values
