ERIC Number: ED616217
Record Type: Non-Journal
Publication Date: 2021
Pages: 8
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: N/A
EISSN: N/A
Available Date: N/A
Why Should We Argue about the Process If the Outcome Is the Same? When Communicational Breaches Remain Unresolved
Knox, Joanne
Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA) (43rd, Singapore, 2021)
This paper uses the commognitive framework to analyse how a group of four primary school students classify odd and even numbers. The findings show how students' reasoning is grounded in their personal uses of "odd" and "even". The students attend to different features of "oddness" and "evenness" and agree on "which" numbers are odd and even but disagree about "why." The findings highlight the role that proving can play in signalling differences in reasoning within a group of students that may otherwise remain hidden. However, they also suggest students' awareness of the breach in communication may not be sufficient to engender a resolution, even when pedagogical moves toward this direction are made.
Descriptors: Elementary School Students, Classification, Thinking Skills, Decision Making, Mathematics Instruction, Teaching Methods, Grade 4, Task Analysis, Foreign Countries, Cooperative Learning, Conflict, Class Activities
Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. GPO Box 2747, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia. Tel: +61-8-8363-0288; Fax: +61-8-8362-9288; e-mail: sales@merga.net.au; Web site: http://www.merga.net.au/
Publication Type: Speeches/Meeting Papers; Reports - Research
Education Level: Elementary Education; Grade 4; Intermediate Grades
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA)
Identifiers - Location: New Zealand
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: N/A