Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Attendance | 1 |
| College Freshmen | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Engineering Education | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Statistical Analysis | 1 |
| Supplementary Education | 1 |
Source
| Journal of Peer Learning | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Sweden | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textMalm, Joakim; Bryngfors, Leif; Mörner, Lise-Lotte – Journal of Peer Learning, 2011
The customary way to determine whether an adopted Supplemental Instruction (SI) program has been successful or not is by comparing course results for two groups, SI attendees and non-attendees. The division of SI attendees and non-attendees is generally done rather arbitrarily by prescribing a minimum number of SI sessions a student has to attend…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Engineering Education, Supplementary Education, Foreign Countries
