Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Error Correction | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Program Effectiveness | 2 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| English (Second Language) | 1 |
| Essays | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Grade 10 | 1 |
| Grammar | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Grade 10 | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Taiwan | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Michigan Test of English… | 1 |
| Myers Briggs Type Indicator | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkTseng, Sheng-Chau; Tsai, Chin-Chung – Computers & Education, 2007
The purposes of this study were to explore the effects and the validity of on-line peer assessment in high schools and to analyze effects of various types of peer feedback on students. The participating students, a total of 184 10th graders, developed their individual course projects by involving the on-line peer assessment learning activities in…
Descriptors: Program Effectiveness, Grade 10, Feedback (Response), Peer Evaluation
Download full textJones, Nathan Brian; Wang, Shun Hwa – Online Submission, 2004
The issue of whether or not to correct errors in students' writing is controversial. Some scholars argue that error correction is helpful, while others argue that it is ineffective, perhaps even harmful. What is missing from the literature are studies about how error correction might affect the performance of specific types of students. This…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Writing Skills, Program Effectiveness, English (Second Language)
