NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Location
Texas4
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Prochnow, Harold G. – 1973
The final audit report (1972)73) on the Bilingual Education Program of the San Marcos Independent School District critiques the quality of the project and the audit. The 5 sections of the audit are: (1) introductory and general comments on the quality of the project evaluation and the comparative findings of the project evaluation and the audit;…
Descriptors: Bilingual Education, Comparative Analysis, Educational Improvement, Evaluation Criteria
Pryor, Guy C. – 1970
The purpose of the audit report on the Bilingual Education Program (1969-70) of the Harlandale and San Marcos Independent School Districts is to give a critique on the quality of the project evaluation, to discuss the comparative findings of the project evaluation and the audit, and to confirm or question the need for program modifications…
Descriptors: Bilingual Education, Comparative Analysis, Educational Improvement, Evaluation Criteria
Pryor, Guy C. – 1971
The audit report (1970-71) on the Bilingual Education Program of the Harlandale and San Marcos Independent School Districts gives a critique on the quality of the project evaluation, discusses the comparative findings of the project evaluation and the audit, and confirms or questions the need for program modifications proposed in the evaluation.…
Descriptors: Bilingual Education, Comparative Analysis, Educational Improvement, Evaluation Criteria
Pryor, Guy C. – 1972
The final audit report (1971-72) on the Bilingual Education Program of the Harlandale and San Marcos Independent School Districts gives a critique on the quality of the project evaluation, discusses the comparative findings of the project evaluation and the audit, and confirms or questions the need for program modifications proposed in the…
Descriptors: Bilingual Education, Comparative Analysis, Educational Improvement, Evaluation Criteria