Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Computation | 3 |
Grade 5 | 3 |
Grade 8 | 3 |
Hierarchical Linear Modeling | 3 |
Correlation | 2 |
Grade 10 | 2 |
Grade 11 | 2 |
Randomized Controlled Trials | 2 |
Research Design | 2 |
School Districts | 2 |
Science Achievement | 2 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 3 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 3 |
Grade 5 | 3 |
Grade 8 | 3 |
Intermediate Grades | 3 |
Junior High Schools | 3 |
Middle Schools | 3 |
Secondary Education | 3 |
Grade 10 | 2 |
Grade 11 | 2 |
High Schools | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Location
Texas | 3 |
Colorado | 1 |
Florida | 1 |
New York | 1 |
North Carolina | 1 |
Tennessee | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Westine, Carl D. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2016
Little is known empirically about intraclass correlations (ICCs) for multisite cluster randomized trial (MSCRT) designs, particularly in science education. In this study, ICCs suitable for science achievement studies using a three-level (students in schools in districts) MSCRT design that block on district are estimated and examined. Estimates of…
Descriptors: Efficiency, Evaluation Methods, Science Achievement, Correlation
Westine, Carl D. – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2015
A cluster-randomized trial (CRT) relies on random assignment of intact clusters to treatment conditions, such as classrooms or schools (Raudenbush & Bryk, 2002). One specific type of CRT, a multi-site CRT (MSCRT), is commonly employed in educational research and evaluation studies (Spybrook & Raudenbush, 2009; Spybrook, 2014; Bloom,…
Descriptors: Correlation, Randomized Controlled Trials, Science Achievement, Cluster Grouping
Murphy, Daniel L.; Beretvas, S. Natasha – Applied Measurement in Education, 2015
This study examines the use of cross-classified random effects models (CCrem) and cross-classified multiple membership random effects models (CCMMrem) to model rater bias and estimate teacher effectiveness. Effect estimates are compared using CTT versus item response theory (IRT) scaling methods and three models (i.e., conventional multilevel…
Descriptors: Teacher Effectiveness, Comparative Analysis, Hierarchical Linear Modeling, Test Theory