Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Instruction | 2 |
| Teacher Attitudes | 2 |
| Usability | 2 |
| Automation | 1 |
| Barriers | 1 |
| Common Core State Standards | 1 |
| Early Adolescents | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| Instructional Effectiveness | 1 |
| Intervention | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Junior High Schools | 2 |
| Middle Schools | 2 |
| Secondary Education | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| Intermediate Grades | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Texas | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkWilson, Joshua; Roscoe, Rod D. – Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2020
The present study extended research on the effectiveness of automated writing evaluation (AWE) systems. Sixth graders were randomly assigned by classroom to an AWE condition that used "Project Essay Grade Writing" (n = 56) or a word-processing condition that used Google Docs (n = 58). Effectiveness was evaluated using multiple metrics:…
Descriptors: Automation, Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Instructional Effectiveness
Bippert, Kelli; Harmon, Janis – Reading Psychology, 2017
Middle schools often turn to computer-assisted reading intervention programs to improve student reading. The questions guiding this study are (a) in what ways are computer-assisted reading intervention programs utilized, and (b) what are teachers' perceptions about these intervention programs? Nineteen secondary reading teachers were interviewed…
Descriptors: Middle School Teachers, Computer Assisted Instruction, Reading Programs, Intervention
