Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 5 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 5 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 5 |
| Elementary School Students | 5 |
| Predictive Validity | 5 |
| Achievement Tests | 3 |
| At Risk Students | 3 |
| Grade 4 | 3 |
| Reading Comprehension | 3 |
| Reading Tests | 3 |
| Screening Tests | 3 |
| State Standards | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Kent, Shawn C. | 2 |
| Michael Matta | 2 |
| Milena A. Keller-Margulis | 2 |
| Sterett H. Mercer | 2 |
| Wanzek, Jeanne | 2 |
| Yun, Joonmo | 2 |
| Jones, John H. | 1 |
| Keller-Margulis, Milena A. | 1 |
| Ochs, Sarah | 1 |
| Santi, Kristi L. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 5 |
| Journal Articles | 3 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 5 |
| Grade 4 | 3 |
| Intermediate Grades | 3 |
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Primary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Texas | 5 |
| Florida | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Dynamic Indicators of Basic… | 2 |
| Florida Comprehensive… | 2 |
| Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests | 2 |
| Woodcock Reading Mastery Test | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full text
Direct linkMichael Matta; Sterett H. Mercer; Milena A. Keller-Margulis – Grantee Submission, 2022
Written expression curriculum-based measurement (WE-CBM) is a formative assessment approach for screening and progress monitoring. To extend evaluation of WE-CBM, we compared hand-calculated and automated scoring approaches in relation to the number of screening samples needed per student for valid scores, the long-term predictive validity and…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Predictive Validity, Formative Evaluation
Michael Matta; Sterett H. Mercer; Milena A. Keller-Margulis – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2022
Written expression curriculum-based measurement (WE-CBM) is a formative assessment approach for screening and progress monitoring. To extend evaluation of WE-CBM, we compared hand-calculated and automated scoring approaches in relation to the number of screening samples needed per student for valid scores, the long-term predictive validity and…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Predictive Validity, Formative Evaluation
Ochs, Sarah; Keller-Margulis, Milena A.; Santi, Kristi L.; Jones, John H. – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2020
Universal screening is the first mechanism by which students are identified as at risk of failure in the context of multitiered systems of supports. This study examined the validity and diagnostic accuracy of a reading computer-adaptive test as a screener to identify state achievement test performance for third through fifth graders (N = 1,696).…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Accuracy, Reading Tests
Kent, Shawn C.; Wanzek, Jeanne; Yun, Joonmo – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2019
This study examined the predictive validity and classification accuracy of individual- and group-administered screening measures relative to student performance on a year-end state reading assessment in two states. A sample of 321 students was assessed in the areas of word-level and text fluency, as well as reading comprehension in the fall of…
Descriptors: Screening Tests, Grade 4, Elementary School Students, At Risk Students
Kent, Shawn C.; Wanzek, Jeanne; Yun, Joonmo – Grantee Submission, 2019
This study examined the predictive validity and classification accuracy of individual and group-administered screening measures relative to student performance on a year-end state reading assessment in two states. A sample of 321 students were assessed in the areas of word-level and text fluency, as well as reading comprehension in the fall of…
Descriptors: Screening Tests, Grade 4, Elementary School Students, At Risk Students
