Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Models | 2 |
| Program Implementation | 2 |
| Systems Development | 2 |
| Design Preferences | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Faculty Development | 1 |
| Fidelity | 1 |
| Hospitals | 1 |
| Information Technology | 1 |
| Innovation | 1 |
| Peer Evaluation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Texas | 2 |
| Alabama | 1 |
| Arkansas | 1 |
| Delaware | 1 |
| Florida | 1 |
| Georgia | 1 |
| Kentucky | 1 |
| Louisiana | 1 |
| Maryland | 1 |
| Mississippi | 1 |
| North Carolina | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkGandha, Tysza; Baxter, Andy – Southern Regional Education Board (SREB), 2016
This report offers state leaders key areas for action to continue progress in implementing evaluation systems, even as federal policies on teacher evaluation relax state requirements. The Southern Regional Education Board (SREB) offers its current best thinking for how state agencies can make the smartest use of funds, time and partners to refine…
Descriptors: Teacher Evaluation, State Action, Teacher Effectiveness, State Agencies
Peer reviewedWilliams, Josie R.; Mechler, Kathy; Akins, Ralitsa B. – Journal of Rural Health, 2008
Context: The peer review process in small rural hospitals is complicated by limited numbers of physicians, conflict of interest, issues related to appropriate utilization of new technology, possibility for conflicting recommendations, and need for external expertise. Purpose: The purpose of this project was to design, test, and implement a virtual…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Physicians, Rural Areas, Hospitals
