Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 3 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 6 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Source
| Reading Matrix: An… | 2 |
| Computer Assisted Language… | 1 |
| Cypriot Journal of… | 1 |
| English Language Teaching… | 1 |
| Journal of Curriculum and… | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 6 |
| Reports - Research | 6 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Turkey | 6 |
| Iran | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Learning Style Inventory | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkSolmaz, Fatma; Tas, Songül; Kalin, Imran Mollaoglu – Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 2023
Written corrective feedback (WCF) is widely implemented in EFL writing classrooms; however, there is not consensus on how and to what extent it should be used. The controversial findings of the WCF studies reflected in teaching practices and perceptions of the practitioners on WCF, and many studies reported that there was an inconsistency between…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Error Correction, Written Language, Teacher Attitudes
Kiliçkaya, Ferit – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2022
Although a plethora of research has been conducted on written corrective feedback and timing of feedback in various teaching and learning contexts, there is a paucity of research on learners' preferences regarding different online written corrective feedback. Such a lacuna becomes prominent in EFL contexts, especially in grammar classes, where…
Descriptors: Preservice Teachers, Language Teachers, Electronic Learning, Written Language
Download full textBerkant, Hasan Güner; Derer, Nuriye Batmaz; Derer, Ozgur Kursad – English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 2020
The main purpose of this research was to investigate the effects of different types of written corrective feedback on students' texting mistakes in English lessons. In the study, a mixed model including quantitative and qualitative methods was engaged. Two-factor ANOVA was used for mixed measurements to test the significance of the difference…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Feedback (Response), Teaching Methods, Content Analysis
Kivi, Parivash Jamali; Hernández, Ronald M.; Flores, Jorge Luis Escalante; Garay, Jessica Paola Palacios; Fuster-Guillén, Doris – Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 2021
This study aimed at finding the correlation between Iranian and Turkish EFL learners' cognitive styles and their preferences for different WCF types. Sixty out of seventy-five EFL students at the intermediate level in two contexts (Iran and Turkey) were selected through the Oxford Placement Test. There were two instruments in this research: The…
Descriptors: Correlation, Feedback (Response), Cognitive Style, English (Second Language)
Sakrak-Ekin, Gülnihal; Balçikanli, Cem – Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 2019
This mixed method study aimed to investigate (i) EFL instructors' beliefs about written corrective feedback (WCF) (ii) whether these beliefs are congruent with their classroom practices. Firstly, a questionnaire was administered to 25 English instructors to understand their beliefs regarding WCF. Later, randomly chosen 175 student writing…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Written Language, Feedback (Response), Second Language Learning
Andarab, Mehdi Solhi – Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 2019
Correcting and providing feedback to the written work of the learners has always been one of the hotly-debated issues over the last decades. While a group of scholars argue in favor of the effectiveness of the written corrective (CF) feedback, others question the utility and usefulness of the CF on writing of the learners. Even there seem to be…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Metalinguistics, English (Second Language), Foreign Countries
