Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Reputation | 2 |
| Arabs | 1 |
| Awards | 1 |
| Citations (References) | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Colleges | 1 |
| Educational Environment | 1 |
| Educational Quality | 1 |
| Faculty Publishing | 1 |
| Global Approach | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Quality in Higher Education | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| United Kingdom | 2 |
| Jordan | 1 |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkKyle Grayson; J. Paul Grayson – Quality in Higher Education, 2024
Quality of universities is best viewed through the eyes of stakeholders. Yet, in the United Kingdom and elsewhere, rankings conducted by various agencies purport to provide one overall measure of university quality. This article re-examines some of the data used by university rankers. In so doing, it shows that their information can be repackaged…
Descriptors: Universities, Educational Quality, Reputation, Institutional Evaluation
Altakhaineh, Abdel Rahman Mitib; Zibin, Aseel – Quality in Higher Education, 2021
This study reviews three university ranking methodologies: Quacquarelli Sysmonds University Rankings, The Times Higher Education World University Rankings, and the Shanghai Jiao Tong University's Academic Ranking of World Universities. It also aims to suggest two new methodologies, one for World University Ranking and one for Arab University…
Descriptors: Arabs, Foreign Countries, Higher Education, Institutional Characteristics
