NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ1473745
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2025-Jun
Pages: 15
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: N/A
EISSN: EISSN-2692-9384
Available Date: 2024-08-17
Development of a Brief Assessment Tool to Identify Children with Probable Anxiety Disorders
Tessa Reardon1; Obioha C. Ukoumunne2; Susan Ball2; Paul Brown3; Tamsin Ford4; Alastair Gray5; Claire Hill6; Bec Jasper7; Michael Larkin8; Ian Macdonald9; Fran Morgan10; Michelle Sancho11; Falko F. Sniehotta12,13; Susan H. Spence14; Jason Stainer15; Paul Stallard16; Mara Violato5; iCATS Team1,17; Cathy Creswell1,17
JCPP Advances, v5 n2 e12265 2025
Background: Difficulties identifying anxiety disorders in primary-school aged children present significant barriers to timely access to support and intervention. This study aimed to develop a brief assessment tool that can identify children with anxiety disorders in community settings, with a high level of sensitivity and specificity. Methods: Children (aged 8-11 years), and their parents/carers and teachers from 19 primary/junior schools in England each completed a pool of questionnaire items that assessed child anxiety symptoms and associated impact. Diagnostic assessments (Anxiety Disorder Interview Schedule for Children: Child and Parent interviews) were administered by independent assessors to determine the presence/absence of anxiety disorders in children. We created alternative candidate brief child-, parent-, teacher-report questionnaires consisting of the 'best' items selected from the wider pool of completed items. We used exploratory factor analysis to reduce the item pool, and multivariable backward elimination logistic regression to identify items that were the strongest predictors of the presence/absence of an anxiety disorder. Results: Parents/carers of 646 children provided consent; child/parent/teacher-report questionnaires were collected for 582/646/565 children respectively; and diagnostic outcome data were collected for 463 children. None of the brief child- nor teacher-report questionnaires achieved acceptable sensitivity/specificity (<75%). Parent-report questionnaires including between 2 and 9 items that assess anxiety symptoms and/or associated impact achieved acceptable sensitivity and specificity ([greater than or equal to]75%). Conclusions: The two-item parent-report measure that assesses distress and impairment associated with anxiety brings the advantage of brevity and has the potential to be used in community settings to improve identification of children with anxiety disorders.
Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: Elementary Education; Junior High Schools; Middle Schools; Secondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers - Location: United Kingdom (England)
Identifiers - Assessments and Surveys: Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: 1Departments of Experimental Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK; 2NIHR ARC South West Peninsula (PenARC), University of Exeter, UK; 3Bransgore C of E Primary School, UK; 4University of Cambridge and Cambridge and Peterborough Foundation Trust, UK; 5Nuffield Department of Population Health, Health Economics Research Centre, UK; 6School of Psychology & Clinical Language Sciences, UK; 7Parents and Carers Together, Suffolk, UK; 8Life and Health Sciences, Birmingham, UK; 9Charlie Waller Trust, UK; 10Square Peg, UK; 11West Berkshire Council, Newbury, UK; 12NIHR Policy Research Unit Behavioural Science, UK; 13Division of Public Health, Social and Preventive Medicine, Heidelberg, Germany; 14School of Applied Psychology and Australian Institute of Suicide Research and Prevention, Australia; 15Stanley Primary School, London, UK; 16Department of Health, University of Bath, UK; 17Oxford NHS Foundation Trust, UK