Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Academic Achievement | 2 |
| Class Size | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Scores | 2 |
| Statistical Analysis | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Curriculum Based Assessment | 1 |
| Diagnostic Tests | 1 |
| Direct Instruction | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| Experiments | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Wisconsin | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Comprehensive Tests of Basic… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkKlingbeil, David A.; Nelson, Peter M.; Van Norman, Ethan R.; Birr, Chris – Remedial and Special Education, 2017
We examined the diagnostic accuracy and efficiency of three approaches to universal screening for reading difficulties using retrospective data from 1,307 students in Grades 3 through 5. School staff collected screening data using the Measures of Academic Progress (MAP), a curriculum-based measure (CBM), and running records (RR). The criterion…
Descriptors: Screening Tests, Diagnostic Tests, Elementary School Students, Grade 3
Download full textThompson, Bruce – Third Education Group Review, 2006
Value-added models, which rate schools for effectiveness while taking into account the poverty and other socioeconomic status of the students, are generating increased interest. This paper describes the use of one such model to evaluate whether school ratings changed when three new programs were introduced: the "Target Teach" curriculum…
Descriptors: Class Size, Program Evaluation, Academic Achievement, School Effectiveness
