Descriptor
| Cognitive Processes | 3 |
| Educational Practices | 3 |
| Incentives | 3 |
| Meta Analysis | 3 |
| Rewards | 3 |
| Student Motivation | 3 |
| Academic Achievement | 2 |
Source
| Review of Educational Research | 3 |
Publication Type
| Book/Product Reviews | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedDeci, Edward L.; Ryan, Richard M.; Koestner, Richard – Review of Educational Research, 2001
Replies to commentary by J. Cameron asserting that the negative results of extrinsic reward on intrinsic motivation are limited and avoidable. Suggests that the most recent meta analysis by Cameron and others shares methodological weaknesses with an earlier analysis, lacking ecological validity. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Educational Practices, Incentives, Meta Analysis
Peer reviewedDeci, Edward L.; Koestner, Richard; Ryan, Richard M. – Review of Educational Research, 2001
Reviews the results of a meta analysis (E. Deci, R. Koestner, and R. Ryan, 1999) that shows that tangible extrinsic rewards do have a substantial undermining effect on intrinsic motivation. Discusses results, which support cognitive evaluation theory, in terms of their relevance for educational practice. (SLD)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Cognitive Processes, Educational Practices, Incentives
Peer reviewedCameron, Judy – Review of Educational Research, 2001
Prior meta analyses by J. Cameron and other researchers suggested that the negative effects of extrinsic reward on intrinsic motivation were limited and avoidable. E. Deci and others (2001) suggested that the analyses were flawed. This commentary makes the case that there is no inherent negative property of reward. (SLD)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Cognitive Processes, Educational Practices, Incentives
