Uses a dialogue format to critique the arguments of W. Roth and M. Tobin for a radical departure from traditional conceptions and discussions of teacher evaluation. Makes the case that before considering radical new approaches, evaluators should understand strengths and weaknesses of existing models. (SLD)

Responds to the criticism offered by M. Scriven of the call for a radical new approach to teacher evaluation made by M. Roth and K. Tobin, noting that more builders of evaluation theory are needed, especially builders of theory that can be useful as the starting point for change. (SLD)

Analyzes the contents of "Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education" (JPEE) since its inception in 1987. Concludes that the JPEE has published a comprehensive array of evaluation theory and practice articles, and that the journal is highly oriented toward teacher evaluation and dominated by U.S. authors. (Author/SLD)