Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Control Groups | 5 |
Experimental Groups | 5 |
Educational Research | 4 |
Program Evaluation | 4 |
Data Analysis | 3 |
Evaluation Methods | 3 |
Guides | 3 |
Intervention | 3 |
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Data | 2 |
Evaluation | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Coalition for Evidence-Based… | 1 |
Educational Evaluation and… | 1 |
National Center for Education… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse | 1 |
Author
Akers, Lauren | 1 |
Berk, Jillian | 1 |
Drew, David E. | 1 |
Fitz-Gibbon, Carol Taylor | 1 |
Morris, Lynn Lyons | 1 |
Resch, Alexandra | 1 |
Publication Type
Guides - Non-Classroom | 5 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Administrators | 1 |
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Akers, Lauren; Resch, Alexandra; Berk, Jillian – National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, 2014
This guide for district and school leaders shows how to recognize opportunities to embed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) into planned policies or programs. Opportunistic RCTs can generate strong evidence for informing education decisions--with minimal added cost and disruption. The guide also outlines the key steps to conduct RCTs and responds…
Descriptors: School Districts, Educational Research, Guides, Program Evaluation
What Works Clearinghouse, 2014
This "What Works Clearinghouse Procedures and Standards Handbook (Version 3.0)" provides a detailed description of the standards and procedures of the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC). The remaining chapters of this Handbook are organized to take the reader through the basic steps that the WWC uses to develop a review protocol, identify…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Guides, Intervention, Classification

Drew, David E. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1983
This paper presents a new technique in which covariates are controlled and evaluation data still are presented graphically in a manner that makes sense to policy makers. An illustration is provided using data drawn from an evaluation by the author of a major National Science Foundation (NSF) university funding program. (Author)
Descriptors: Control Groups, Data, Evaluation, Experimental Groups
Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy, 2005
This is a checklist of key items to get right when conducting a randomized controlled trial to evaluate an educational program or practice ("intervention"). It is intended as a practical resource for researchers and sponsors of research, describing items that are often critical to the success of a randomized controlled trial. A significant…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Program Evaluation, Intervention, Scientific Methodology
Fitz-Gibbon, Carol Taylor; Morris, Lynn Lyons – 1978
The evaluation design, which prescribes when and from whom to gather data, is described as significant because it can lend credibility to evaluation results. The objectives of this booklet are to aid the evaluator in: choosing a design; putting it into operation; and analyzing and reporting the data. Examples include both formative and summative…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Control Groups, Educational Research, Evaluation Methods