NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Naglieri, Jack A. – School Psychology Review, 1999
Responds to Kranzler and Keith (this issue) by providing data from a data-driven approach that suggests the Cognitive Assessment System (CAS) has validity. Provides evidence that the interpretation of the planning, attention, simultaneous and successive (PASS Scales) theory described in the "CAS Interpretive Handbook" is well supported.…
Descriptors: Cognitive Measurement, Evaluation Methods, Factor Analysis, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kranzler, John H.; Keith, Timothy Z. – School Psychology Review, 1999
Uses confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to address unresolved issues concerning the structure of the Cognitive Assessment System, a test of intelligence based upon the planning, attention, and simultaneous-successive (PASS) processes theory of human cognition. Results reveal that the CFA of the standardization data do not support use of the CAS…
Descriptors: Cognitive Measurement, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Keith, Timothy Z.; Kranzler, John H.; Flanagan, Dawn P. – School Psychology Review, 2001
Reports the results of the first joint confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the Cognitive Assessment System (CAS) and the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities-3rd Edition (WJ III). Results of these analyses do not support the construct validity of the CAS as a measure of the PASS (planning, attention, simultaneous, and sequential)…
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Measurement, Construct Validity, Factor Analysis