Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Source
Journal of Special Education | 31 |
Author
White, Karl R. | 2 |
Bailey, Donald B., Jr. | 1 |
Billingsley, Bonnie S. | 1 |
Bouck, Emily C. | 1 |
Bryan, Anne J. | 1 |
Buysse, Virginia | 1 |
Coles, Gerald S. | 1 |
Deardorff, Malarie E. | 1 |
Deichmann, John | 1 |
Eno, Larry | 1 |
Eysenck, H. J. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Information Analyses | 31 |
Journal Articles | 31 |
Reports - Research | 7 |
Opinion Papers | 4 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Audience
Researchers | 8 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Bender Visual Motor Gestalt… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peltier, Corey; Morin, Kristi L.; Bouck, Emily C.; Lingo, Mindy E.; Pulos, Joshua M.; Scheffler, Faye A.; Suk, Andrea; Mathews, Leslie A.; Sinclair, Tracy E.; Deardorff, Malarie E. – Journal of Special Education, 2020
Manipulatives are widely considered an effective practice and have been recommended as an evidence-based practice for students identified with a learning disability when used within the concrete--representational--abstract instructional framework. The aim of the current study was to evaluate single-case experimental designs that implemented a…
Descriptors: At Risk Students, Students with Disabilities, Manipulative Materials, Research Design
Spriggs, Amy D.; Mims, Pamela J.; van Dijk, Wilhelmina; Knight, Victoria F. – Journal of Special Education, 2017
We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature to establish the evidence base for using visual activity schedules (VAS) with individuals with intellectual disability. Literature published after 2005 was evaluated for quality using the criteria developed by Horner et al.; a total of 14 studies were included as acceptable. Findings suggest…
Descriptors: Literature Reviews, Intellectual Disability, Evidence Based Practice, Daily Living Skills
Lane, Justin D.; Lieberman-Betz, Rebecca; Gast, David L. – Journal of Special Education, 2016
The purpose of this review was to identify naturalistic language interventions for increasing spontaneous expressive language (defined in this review as absence of verbal prompt or other verbalization from adults or peers) in young children with autism spectrum disorder. Also, the methodological rigor and effectiveness of each study were evaluated…
Descriptors: Intervention, Expressive Language, Pervasive Developmental Disorders, Autism
Heyvaert, Mieke; Wendt, Oliver; Van den Noortgate, Wim; Onghena, Patrick – Journal of Special Education, 2015
Reporting standards and critical appraisal tools serve as beacons for researchers, reviewers, and research consumers. Parallel to existing guidelines for researchers to report and evaluate group-comparison studies, single-case experimental (SCE) researchers are in need of guidelines for reporting and evaluating SCE studies. A systematic search was…
Descriptors: Standards, Research Methodology, Comparative Analysis, Experiments
Sandieson, Robert W.; Kirkpatrick, Lori C.; Sandieson, Rachel M.; Zimmerman, Walter – Journal of Special Education, 2010
Digital technologies enable the storage of vast amounts of information, accessible with remarkable ease. However, along with this facility comes the challenge to find pertinent information from the volumes of nonrelevant information. The present article describes the pearl-harvesting methodological framework for information retrieval. Pearl…
Descriptors: Developmental Disabilities, Literature Reviews, Information Retrieval, Databases

Pillemer, David B. – Journal of Special Education, 1984
The paper explores the conceptual bases of the controversy over meta analysis and computes it with traditional research on four dimensions: (1) scientific rigor, (2) detecting small effects, (3) problems of oversimplification, and (4) potential policy impact. It is argued that choice of procedures should be determined by the specific purpose of a…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Meta Analysis, Research Methodology

Eysenck, H. J. – Journal of Special Education, 1984
The paper reviews objections to meta-analysis in psychotherapy. It is suggested that claims to inclusiveness and objectivity are not supported by the evidence, and that for most purposes the simplistic scoring systems of meta-analysis are not only useless, but may be counterproductive. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Emotional Disturbances, Psychotherapy, Research Methodology, Research Problems

Hopkins, Kenneth D. – Journal of Special Education, 1986
The paper discusses unique problems associated with affective dependent measures in comparative studies in special education. The use of a brief response integrity scale is recommended to assess differential magnitude of the social desirability response style when groups are to be compared. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Affective Behavior, Attitude Measures, Disabilities, Research Methodology

Gersten, Russell M. – Journal of Special Education, 1980
A critical review of the literature indicates that overselective attention: (1) is not limited to autistic children, (2) may be only one of several developmental lags these children display, and (3) may or may not be strongly correlated with children's language abilities and general intellectual abilities. (Author)
Descriptors: Attention, Autism, Cognitive Processes, Information Processing

Schmidt, Mary; And Others – Journal of Special Education, 1986
The meta-analysis of 22 studies on the effectiveness of computer assisted instruction (CAI) with exceptional children indicated that most studies reported CAI to be largely effective but that the result of calculating effect sizes indicated a moderate effect for CAI. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Disabilities, Meta Analysis, Program Effectiveness

White, Michael; Miller, Sidney R. – Journal of Special Education, 1983
A study of articles appearing in the "Journal of Learning Disabilities," from 1971 through 1980, yielded results such as 87 percent of definitions of dyslexia were in terms of a selective reading or spelling deficiency on a standardized test and only one of 45 studies classified dyslexics. (Author/MC)
Descriptors: Definitions, Dyslexia, Learning Disabilities, Literature Reviews

White, Karl R.; And Others – Journal of Special Education, 1986
Using 52 previous reviews of the early intervention efficacy literature, the article demonstrates the value of systematically considering previous reviews before initiating a new review. The authors suggest that tabulations of conclusions of reviews serve as hypotheses to be confirmed or rejected by objective synthesis methods. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Intervention, Literature Reviews, Meta Analysis

Kavale, Kenneth A. – Journal of Special Education, 1984
The need for research synthesis is explored as well as the benefits of meta-analysis, particularly those related to understanding and explanation. The problems with traditional review methods are discussed, with special relevance to their failure to resolve problems. Finally, the findings from several meta-analyses are summarized and contrasted…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Meta Analysis, Research Methodology

Spitz, Herman H. – Journal of Special Education, 1983
The author critically reviews the literature on the developmental approach to mental retardation by examining such aspects as motivation, interrupted tasks, probability learning, institutional effect, statistical problems, and Piagetian tasks; and questions whether there is a substantial body of valid evidence supporting claims of…
Descriptors: Developmental Psychology, Developmental Stages, Developmental Tasks, Mental Retardation

Salvia, John A.; Meisel, C. Julius – Journal of Special Education, 1980
The authors review the impact of research hypotheses and subject characteristics on the validity of observations. About half of the research articles ran substantial risk of biased observation; in about three-fourths of these articles, no precautions were taken by the researchers to safeguard the validity of their observations. (Author)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Exceptional Child Research, Experimenter Characteristics, Literature Reviews