NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 12 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Brinley N. Zabriskie; Nolan Cole; Jacob Baldauf; Craig Decker – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
Meta-analyses have become the gold standard for synthesizing evidence from multiple clinical trials, and they are especially useful when outcomes are rare or adverse since individual trials often lack sufficient power to detect a treatment effect. However, when zero events are observed in one or both treatment arms in a trial, commonly used…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Error Correction, Computation, Simulation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Guido Schwarzer; Gerta Rücker; Cristina Semaca – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
The "LFK" index has been promoted as an improved method to detect bias in meta-analysis. Putatively, its performance does not depend on the number of studies in the meta-analysis. We conducted a simulation study, comparing the "LFK" index test to three standard tests for funnel plot asymmetry in settings with smaller or larger…
Descriptors: Bias, Meta Analysis, Simulation, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Suzanne C. Freeman; Alex J. Sutton; Nicola J. Cooper; Alessandro Gasparini; Michael J. Crowther; Neil Hawkins – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
Background: Traditionally, meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes reports a single pooled hazard ratio assuming proportional hazards (PH). For health technology assessment evaluations, hazard ratios are frequently extrapolated across a lifetime horizon. However, when treatment effects vary over time, an assumption of PH is not always valid. The…
Descriptors: Cancer, Medical Research, Bayesian Statistics, Meta Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yao, Minghong; Wang, Yuning; Ren, Yan; Jia, Yulong; Zou, Kang; Li, Ling; Sun, Xin – Research Synthesis Methods, 2023
Rare events meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are often underpowered because the outcomes are infrequent. Real-world evidence (RWE) from non-randomized studies may provide valuable complementary evidence about the effects of rare events, and there is growing interest in including such evidence in the decision-making process.…
Descriptors: Evidence, Meta Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trials, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Veroniki, Areti Angeliki; Jackson, Dan; Bender, Ralf; Kuss, Oliver; Langan, Dean; Higgins, Julian P. T.; Knapp, Guido; Salanti, Georgia – Research Synthesis Methods, 2019
Meta-analyses are an important tool within systematic reviews to estimate the overall effect size and its confidence interval for an outcome of interest. If heterogeneity between the results of the relevant studies is anticipated, then a random-effects model is often preferred for analysis. In this model, a prediction interval for the true effect…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Effect Size, Simulation, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hartwig, Fernando P.; Davey Smith, George; Schmidt, Amand F.; Sterne, Jonathan A. C.; Higgins, Julian P. T.; Bowden, Jack – Research Synthesis Methods, 2020
Meta-analyses based on systematic literature reviews are commonly used to obtain a quantitative summary of the available evidence on a given topic. However, the reliability of any meta-analysis is constrained by that of its constituent studies. One major limitation is the possibility of small-study effects, when estimates from smaller and larger…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Research Methodology, Effect Size, Robustness (Statistics)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Seide, Svenja E.; Jensen, Katrin; Kieser, Meinhard – Research Synthesis Methods, 2020
The performance of statistical methods is often evaluated by means of simulation studies. In case of network meta-analysis of binary data, however, simulations are not currently available for many practically relevant settings. We perform a simulation study for sparse networks of trials under between-trial heterogeneity and including multi-arm…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Meta Analysis, Data Analysis, Networks
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Langan, Dean; Higgins, Julian P. T.; Jackson, Dan; Bowden, Jack; Veroniki, Areti Angeliki; Kontopantelis, Evangelos; Viechtbauer, Wolfgang; Simmonds, Mark – Research Synthesis Methods, 2019
Studies combined in a meta-analysis often have differences in their design and conduct that can lead to heterogeneous results. A random-effects model accounts for these differences in the underlying study effects, which includes a heterogeneity variance parameter. The DerSimonian-Laird method is often used to estimate the heterogeneity variance,…
Descriptors: Simulation, Meta Analysis, Health, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Günhan, Burak Kürsad; Röver, Christian; Friede, Tim – Research Synthesis Methods, 2020
Meta-analyses of clinical trials targeting rare events face particular challenges when the data lack adequate numbers of events for all treatment arms. Especially when the number of studies is low, standard random-effects meta-analysis methods can lead to serious distortions because of such data sparsity. To overcome this, we suggest the use of…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Medical Research, Drug Therapy, Bayesian Statistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kosch, Robin; Jung, Klaus – Research Synthesis Methods, 2019
Research synthesis, eg, by meta-analysis, is more and more considered in the area of high-dimensional data from molecular research such as gene and protein expression data, especially because most studies and experiments are performed with very small sample sizes. In contrast to most clinical and epidemiological trials, raw data are often…
Descriptors: Genetics, Meta Analysis, Molecular Structure, Scientific Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Langan, Dean; Higgins, Julian P. T.; Simmonds, Mark – Research Synthesis Methods, 2017
Random-effects meta-analysis methods include an estimate of between-study heterogeneity variance. We present a systematic review of simulation studies comparing the performance of different estimation methods for this parameter. We summarise the performance of methods in relation to estimation of heterogeneity and of the overall effect estimate,…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Simulation, Comparative Analysis, Intervals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Veroniki, Areti Angeliki; Jackson, Dan; Viechtbauer, Wolfgang; Bender, Ralf; Bowden, Jack; Knapp, Guido; Kuss, Oliver; Higgins, Julian P. T.; Langan, Dean; Salanti, Georgia – Research Synthesis Methods, 2016
Meta-analyses are typically used to estimate the overall/mean of an outcome of interest. However, inference about between-study variability, which is typically modelled using a between-study variance parameter, is usually an additional aim. The DerSimonian and Laird method, currently widely used by default to estimate the between-study variance,…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Methods, Computation, Simulation