Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Abstract Reasoning | 3 |
Age Differences | 3 |
Cognitive Ability | 2 |
Correlation | 2 |
Effect Size | 2 |
Foreign Countries | 2 |
Meta Analysis | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Achievement Tests | 1 |
Analogy | 1 |
Autism | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Al-Taie, Shems | 1 |
Goswami, Usha | 1 |
Jablansky, Sophie | 1 |
Landry, Oriane | 1 |
Scalise, Nicole R. | 1 |
Wentzel, Kathryn R. | 1 |
Publication Type
Information Analyses | 3 |
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
United Kingdom (Cambridge) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Wentzel, Kathryn R.; Jablansky, Sophie; Scalise, Nicole R. – Educational Psychology Review, 2018
Using meta-analytic techniques, we examined systematically the evidence linking friendship to academically related outcomes, asking: To what extent is friendship related to academic performance and to academically related cognitive skills? Based on 22 studies that yielded 81 effect sizes and 28 independent samples, we examined relations between…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Friendship, Correlation, Academic Achievement
Landry, Oriane; Al-Taie, Shems – Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2016
We conducted a meta-analysis of 31 studies, spanning 30 years, utilizing the WCST in participants with autism. We calculated Cohen's d effect sizes for four measures of performance: sets completed, perseveration, failure-to-maintain-set, and non-perseverative errors. The average weighted effect size ranged from 0.30 to 0.74 for each measure, all…
Descriptors: Executive Function, Cognitive Tests, Cognitive Ability, Abstract Reasoning

Goswami, Usha – Child Development, 1991
Children's analogical reasoning has traditionally been measured by classical four-term analogy tasks or problem-solving tasks. Current theories of analogical development and the evidence on which they are based are reviewed. It is concluded that structural views of analogical development are wrong, and knowledge-based accounts of what develops are…
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Age Differences, Analogy, Children