Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Source
Australasian Journal of… | 2 |
Author
Elisabeth Duursma | 1 |
Isabelle Wentworth | 1 |
Kumaran Rajaram | 1 |
Lynn Sheridan | 1 |
Mingyue Gu | 1 |
Montserrat Ros | 1 |
Qi Xia | 1 |
Rachel A. Jones | 1 |
Rebekkah Middleton | 1 |
Sasha Nikolic | 1 |
Simon Moss | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Information Analyses | 2 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Australia | 1 |
Canada | 1 |
China | 1 |
Finland | 1 |
Malaysia | 1 |
Netherlands | 1 |
Saudi Arabia | 1 |
Singapore | 1 |
Spain | 1 |
Sweden | 1 |
Taiwan | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Sasha Nikolic; Isabelle Wentworth; Lynn Sheridan; Simon Moss; Elisabeth Duursma; Rachel A. Jones; Montserrat Ros; Rebekkah Middleton – Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2024
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has outpaced existing research and regulatory frameworks in higher education, leading to varied institutional responses. Although some educators and institutions have embraced AI and generative AI (GenAI), other individuals remain cautious. This systematic literature review explored teaching…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Teacher Attitudes, Intention, Teacher Behavior
Xiaojing Weng; Qi Xia; Mingyue Gu; Kumaran Rajaram; Thomas K. F. Chiu – Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2024
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) impacts higher education assessment and learning outcomes, which are closely related and intertwined. Literature suggests that educators and researchers have many varied concerns regarding student assessment in the higher education GenAI context, such as how to assess students' learning and the new…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Outcomes of Education, Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing