NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Haegele, Justin Anthony; Hodge, Samuel – Quest, 2017
The primary purpose of this study was to determine what trends exist in the identification and description of participants with disabilities used in school-based physical education research. A total of 60 research articles published in the "Journal of Teaching in Physical Education" from 2010-2014 which included school-aged individuals…
Descriptors: Physical Education, Educational Research, Disabilities, Educational Practices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gage, Nicholas; Gersten, Russell; Sugai, George; Newman-Gonchar, Rebecca – Behavioral Disorders, 2013
Disproportionate representation of English learners in special education has been a longstanding and ongoing concern. However, research examining disproportionate representation of English learners receiving special education services for emotional and/or behavioral disorders (EBD) has been limited. To address this gap, a meta-analysis of…
Descriptors: Disproportionate Representation, English Language Learners, Behavior Disorders, Emotional Disturbances
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lewit, Eugene M.; Baker, Linda Schuurmann – Future of Children, 1996
Examines data collected by the federal Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) on the identification and classification of special education students. Analysis suggests that the OSEP count data, by themselves, do not indicate how many children have disabilities or what types of disabilities they have, and the data cannot by used to evaluate…
Descriptors: Classification, Comparative Analysis, Data Interpretation, Disability Identification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Simms, Rochelle B.; Crump, W. Donald – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1983
Syntactic development in the oral language of learning disabled and normal students at two intermediate and two secondary-school age levels was compared using two indices, the T-unit and the Syntactic Density Score. It was concluded that no single, sensitive, numerical index exists to quantify syntactic development. (SW)
Descriptors: Age Groups, Clinical Diagnosis, Comparative Analysis, Disability Identification