Publication Date
| In 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2024 | 3 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 6 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 6 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Source
| Journal of Educational… | 2 |
| Education and Information… | 1 |
| Interactive Learning… | 1 |
| Language Teaching Research… | 1 |
| Reading Matrix: An… | 1 |
Author
| Di Zou | 1 |
| Fan, Ning | 1 |
| Howard Hao-Jan Chen | 1 |
| Kyle Kuo-Wei Lai | 1 |
| Linqian Ding | 1 |
| Ma, Xiaomei | 1 |
| Ma, Yingying | 1 |
| Mohsen, Mohammed Ali | 1 |
| Thuy Thi-Nhu Ngo | 1 |
| Zhai, Na | 1 |
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 6 |
| Journal Articles | 6 |
| Reports - Research | 4 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Postsecondary Education | 3 |
| Secondary Education | 2 |
| High Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkThuy Thi-Nhu Ngo; Howard Hao-Jan Chen; Kyle Kuo-Wei Lai – Interactive Learning Environments, 2024
The present study performs a three-level meta-analysis to investigate the overall effectiveness of automated writing evaluation (AWE) on EFL/ESL student writing performance. 24 primary studies representing 85 between-group effect sizes and 34 studies representing 178 within-group effect sizes found from 1993 to 2021 were separately meta-analyzed.…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Automation, Computer Software, English (Second Language)
Linqian Ding; Di Zou – Education and Information Technologies, 2024
With the burgeoning popularity and swift advancements of automated writing evaluation (AWE) systems in language classrooms, scholarly and practical interest in this area has noticeably increased. This systematic review aims to comprehensively investigate current research on three prominent AWE systems: Grammarly, Pigai, and Criterion. Objectives…
Descriptors: Automation, Writing Evaluation, Literature Reviews, Computer Software
Download full textFan, Ning; Ma, Yingying – Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 2022
The purpose of this review is to examine the effects of automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback on students' English writing performance. We systematically reviewed studies that have empirically focused on this purpose. This review uses several combinations of key words to search in the databases of JSTOR, SSCI, and ERIC for peer-reviewed…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Student Evaluation, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning
Mohsen, Mohammed Ali – Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2022
Written corrective feedback for improving L2 writing skills has been a debatable issue for more than two decades. The aims of this meta-analysis are to (1) provide a quantitative measure of the effect of computer-generated written feedback for improving L2 writing skills and (2) verify how moderators (i.e., adopted technology, task types, and…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Teaching Methods, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 2025
This systematic review examines 22 studies (2024-2025) on the use of generative AI, primarily ChatGPT, for providing feedback in English writing instruction for language learners. It identifies the types of feedback AI offers, its effectiveness relative to teacher and peer feedback, and perceptions from students and teachers. Findings show AI…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Teaching Methods, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning
Zhai, Na; Ma, Xiaomei – Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2023
Automated writing evaluation (AWE) has been frequently used to provide feedback on student writing. Many empirical studies have examined the effectiveness of AWE on writing quality, but the results were inconclusive. Thus, the magnitude of AWE's overall effect and factors influencing its effectiveness across studies remained unclear. This study…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Meta Analysis, English (Second Language)
