NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 12 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jing Chen; Ruiqi Wang; Bei Fang; Chen Zuo – Interactive Learning Environments, 2024
Online learning has developed rapidly and billions of learners have participated in various courses. However, the high dropout rate is universal and learning performance is not satisfactory. Fortunately, learners have posted a large number of reviews which express their feedback opinions. The fine-grained aspects and opinions existing in reviews…
Descriptors: Online Courses, Feedback (Response), Opinions, Algorithms
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bin Tan; Hao-Yue Jin; Maria Cutumisu – Computer Science Education, 2024
Background and Context: Computational thinking (CT) has been increasingly added to K-12 curricula, prompting teachers to grade more and more CT artifacts. This has led to a rise in automated CT assessment tools. Objective: This study examines the scope and characteristics of publications that use machine learning (ML) approaches to assess…
Descriptors: Computation, Thinking Skills, Artificial Intelligence, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lin Lin; Danhua Zhou; Jingying Wang; Yu Wang – SAGE Open, 2024
The rapid development of artificial intelligence has driven the transformation of educational evaluation into big data-driven. This study used a systematic literature review method to analyzed 44 empirical research articles on the evaluation of big data education. Firstly, it has shown an increasing trend year by year, and is mainly published in…
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Educational Research, Geographic Regions, Periodicals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Deise Monquelate Arndt; Ramon Mayor Martins; Jean Carlo Rossa Hauck – Informatics in Education, 2025
Critical thinking is a fundamental skill for 21st-century citizens, and it should be promoted from elementary school and developed in computing education. However, assessing the development of critical thinking in educational contexts presents unique challenges. In this study, a systematic mapping was carried out to investigate how to assess the…
Descriptors: Critical Thinking, Elementary Secondary Education, Computer Science Education, 21st Century Skills
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fan Ouyang; Tuan Anh Dinh; Weiqi Xu – Journal for STEM Education Research, 2023
Artificial intelligence (AI), as an emerging technology, has been widely used in STEM education to promote the educational assessment. Although AI-driven educational assessment has the potential to assess students' learning automatically and reduce the workload of instructors, there is still a lack of review works to holistically examine the field…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Artificial Intelligence, STEM Education, Academic Achievement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rasmussen, Edie M. – Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), 1992
Examines parallel computer architecture and the use of parallel processors for text. Topics discussed include parallel algorithms; performance evaluation; parallel information processing; parallel access methods for text; parallel and distributed information retrieval systems; parallel hardware for text; and network models for information…
Descriptors: Algorithms, Computer Networks, Evaluation Methods, Information Processing
Geis, George L. – Journal of Instructional Development, 1984
Discussion of checklists and their variations--job aids, algorithms, heuristics, and decision tables--covers what they are, how they are generated, and some implications of checklisting for instruction, evaluation, and learning. Examples of various kinds of checklists and 11 references are provided. (MBR)
Descriptors: Algorithms, Check Lists, Criteria, Curriculum Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Willett, Peter – Information Processing and Management, 1988
Reviews recent research into the use of hierarchic agglomerative clustering methods for document retrieval. The topics discussed include the calculation of interdocument similarities, algorithms used to implement clustering methods on large databases, validity testing of document hierarchies, appropriate search strategies, and other applications…
Descriptors: Algorithms, Bibliometrics, Cluster Analysis, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Chen, Hsinchun; Chau, Michael – Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), 2004
Presents an overview of machine learning research and reviews methods used for evaluating machine learning systems. Ways that machine-learning algorithms were used in traditional information retrieval systems in the "pre-Web" era are described, and the field of Web mining and how machine learning has been used in different Web mining…
Descriptors: Algorithms, Evaluation Methods, Information Retrieval, Information Science
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Frants, Valery I.; Shapiro, Jacob – Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1991
Discussion of the problem of control in documentary information retrieval (IR) systems focuses on feedback mechanisms. Information needs are discussed, particularly the Problem Oriented Information Need (POIN); the structure of an adaptive IR system is described; and the design of algorithms for automated IR systems is explained. (33 references)…
Descriptors: Algorithms, Computer System Design, Documentation, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kantor, Paul B. – Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), 1994
Identifies current trends in the automation of indexing, of information retrieval, and of interaction between the system and the users. Topics discussed include location, navigation, and indexing; digital libraries; matching documents to queries; weight of concepts; query structure, including fuzzy sets; algorithms; stemming; clustering; users'…
Descriptors: Algorithms, Automatic Indexing, Evaluation Methods, Futures (of Society)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lane, Irving M.; And Others – Group and Organization Studies, 1981
Presents both logical and empirical evidence to illustrate that the conventional scoring algorithm for ranking tasks significantly underestimates the initial level of group ability and that Slevin's alternative scoring algorithm significantly overestimates the initial level of ability. Presents a modification of Slevin's algorithm which authors…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Algorithms, Evaluation Methods, Group Dynamics