Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Debate | 6 |
Models | 6 |
Persuasive Discourse | 5 |
Higher Education | 3 |
Communication Research | 2 |
Communication Skills | 2 |
Evaluative Thinking | 2 |
Judges | 2 |
Audience Awareness | 1 |
Audience Response | 1 |
Censorship | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Bahm, Ken | 1 |
Burleson, Brant R. | 1 |
Cakmak, Ebubekir | 1 |
Clark, J. S. Candy | 1 |
Fadely, Dean | 1 |
Himes, Kenneth G. | 1 |
Tuzel, Sait | 1 |
Publication Type
Information Analyses | 6 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 4 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 1 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
Turkey | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Cakmak, Ebubekir; Tuzel, Sait – Journal of Media Literacy Education, 2015
Media literacy has been widely debated in Turkey since the early 2000s and has been in the curriculum of the secondary schools as an optional subject for nearly a decade. During this time period, about four million students have received media literacy education. The multidisciplinary structure of media literacy has contributed to the interest of…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Media Literacy, Curriculum Development, Government Role
Clark, J. S. Candy – 1989
A study suggests a new approach for evaluating debate techniques. Previously used paradigms all have some disadvantages. Application of the policy-making paradigm, which involves isolating a problem, having one side propose a solution, then having the opponent point out the solution's disadvantages, is difficult because the paradigm does not…
Descriptors: Communication Research, Communication Skills, Debate, Models

Burleson, Brant R. – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1979
Examines distinctions and assumptions underlying methods of argument analysis and criticism and defends descriptive diagrams such as the Toulmin model as illuminating methodological tools. Discusses defining characteristics of argument, presents an application of the Toulmin system, and details the presuppositions associated with context-sensitive…
Descriptors: Debate, Diagrams, Formative Evaluation, Methods
Bahm, Ken – 1988
This paper reviews the newly emergent trend of audience-centered debate paradigms, such as the narrative and the issues-agenda paradigms, in light of an informal logic perspective on the argumentum ad populum fallacy. The paper demonstrates the complexity involved in the evaluation of ad populum arguments as well as the care which must be taken in…
Descriptors: Audience Awareness, Audience Response, Critical Thinking, Debate
Himes, Kenneth G. – 1983
Debate paradigms, which at one time established standards to help judges evaluate arguments and rules to guide debaters' argument choice and strategy selection, no longer offer consistent guidance for either judges or debaters. An increased emphasis on creativity and flexibility has led to a general unwillingness to use a rigid debate format. The…
Descriptors: Communication Research, Communication Skills, Debate, Evaluation Criteria
Fadely, Dean – 1982
College debaters who go to law school are often surprised by the differences between the processes that take place in the court of reason and the process that takes place in the court of law. The court of reason relies mainly on authoritative testimony, while the court of law relies on direct evidence. Evidence in the court of reason is either…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Court Litigation, Court Role, Debate