Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Program Evaluation | 3 |
State Policy | 3 |
Educational Policy | 2 |
Program Implementation | 2 |
Academically Gifted | 1 |
Accountability | 1 |
Career Education | 1 |
Content Analysis | 1 |
Counseling | 1 |
Course Content | 1 |
Curriculum | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Publication Type
Information Analyses | 3 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
California | 1 |
Colorado | 1 |
Iowa | 1 |
Kansas | 1 |
Minnesota | 1 |
Missouri | 1 |
Nebraska | 1 |
New York | 1 |
North Dakota | 1 |
South Dakota | 1 |
Tennessee | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Lockhart, Kari; Meyer, Melanie S.; Crutchfield, Kacey – Journal of Advanced Academics, 2022
Programs for gifted and talented education should be guided by research-based practices, but states' policies vary in their recommendations for programming, and in how they hold local education agencies accountable for implementing those recommendations. State plans for gifted and talented education rely on the voluntary compliance of districts to…
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Gifted Education, State Policy, School Districts
Reagan, Emilie Mitescu; Schram, Thomas; McCurdy, Kathryn; Chang, Te-Hsin; Evans, Carla M. – Education Policy Analysis Archives, 2016
Summative performance assessments in teacher education, such as the Performance Assessment for California Teachers (PACT) and the edTPA, have been heralded through polices intended to enhance the quality of the teaching profession and raise its stature among other professions. However, the development and implementation of the PACT, and…
Descriptors: Politics of Education, Educational Policy, Program Evaluation, Program Implementation
Brodersen, R. Marc; Yanoski, David; Hyslop, Alisha; Imperatore, Catherine – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2016
Career and technical education (CTE) programs of study are subject to rigorous state and federal accountability systems that provide information on key student outcomes. However, while these outcome measures can form a basis for identifying high- and low-performing programs, they are insufficient for answering underlying questions about how or why…
Descriptors: Career Education, Technical Education, Accountability, Program Evaluation