Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
Ben Seipel | 2 |
Mark L. Davison | 2 |
Sarah E. Carlson | 2 |
Terrill Taylor | 2 |
Virginia Clinton-Lisell | 2 |
Paul, T. | 1 |
Samuels, J. | 1 |
Topping, K. J. | 1 |
Publication Type
Information Analyses | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Policymakers | 1 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
ACT Assessment | 2 |
COMPASS (Computer Assisted… | 2 |
Nelson Denny Reading Tests | 2 |
SAT (College Admission Test) | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Virginia Clinton-Lisell; Terrill Taylor; Sarah E. Carlson; Mark L. Davison; Ben Seipel – Grantee Submission, 2022
Standardized reading assessments are often used as an admissions criterion for college admittance, however, the relationship and predictive validity of reading assessments to academic achievement remains in question. Through a quantitative review of the literature, we conducted a meta-analysis to examine how well performance on college reading…
Descriptors: Reading Achievement, Reading Comprehension, Reading Tests, Academic Achievement
Virginia Clinton-Lisell; Terrill Taylor; Sarah E. Carlson; Mark L. Davison; Ben Seipel – Journal of College Reading and Learning, 2022
Reading comprehension assessments are used for postsecondary course placement and advising, and they are components of college entrance exams. Therefore, a quantitative understanding of the relationship between reading comprehension assessments and postsecondary academic achievement is needed. To address this need, we conducted a meta-analysis to…
Descriptors: Reading Achievement, Reading Comprehension, Reading Tests, Academic Achievement
Topping, K. J.; Samuels, J.; Paul, T. – School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2007
This study elaborates the "what works?" question by exploring the effects of variability in program implementation quality on achievement. Particularly, the effects on achievement of computerized assessment of reading were investigated, analyzing data on 51,000 students in Grades 1-12 who read over 3 million books. When minimum implementation…
Descriptors: Program Implementation, Achievement Gains, Reading Achievement, Independent Reading