NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Practitioners1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 27 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Bin Tan; Nour Armoush; Elisabetta Mazzullo; Okan Bulut; Mark J. Gierl – International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2025
This study reviews existing research on the use of large language models (LLMs) for automatic item generation (AIG). We performed a comprehensive literature search across seven research databases, selected studies based on predefined criteria, and summarized 60 relevant studies that employed LLMs in the AIG process. We identified the most commonly…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Test Items, Automation, Test Format
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hongyi Lin; Fengyan Wang – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2024
Accurate measurement of wisdom is the cornerstone of wisdom research. To provide a representative reference for the reliability level and moderating factors of various wisdom self-rating scales, we carried out a reliability generalization meta-analysis of Chinese and English references retrieved from 2004 to 2023. A total of 149 articles were…
Descriptors: Thinking Skills, Intelligence, Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kubra Karakaya-Ozyer – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2025
This study presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment (JPA) over a 15-year period from January 2010 to April 2025. Using data from Web of Science, we analyze publication trends, collaboration patterns, citation impact, and thematic evolution within the field of psychoeducational assessment. The…
Descriptors: Bibliometrics, Periodicals, Educational Assessment, Psychoeducational Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dawn P. Flanagan; Marlene Sotelo-Dynega; Vincent C. Alfonso – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2025
The Woodcock-Johnson V (WJ V; McGrew, Mather, LaForte, et al., 2025) represents the most significant evolution in comprehensive cognitive assessment since the battery was introduced nearly 50 years ago. This article provides an overview of the WJ V Tests of Cognitive Abilities and Virtual Test Library, highlighting key revisions from the WJ IV and…
Descriptors: Cognitive Tests, Cognitive Ability, Psychometrics, Test Interpretation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hamadi, Layla; Fletcher, Helen K. – Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 2021
Attachment difficulties are associated with a range of adverse outcomes in mental health, and people with intellectual disabilities (IDs) may be at greater risk of experiencing difficulties in their attachment relationships. This review critically evaluated recent research measuring the prevalence of attachment difficulties in people with ID.…
Descriptors: Intellectual Disability, At Risk Persons, Adults, Adolescents
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Munoz-Chereau, Bernardita; Ang, Lynn; Dockrell, Julie; Outhwaite, Laura; Heffernan, Claire – Journal of Early Childhood Research, 2021
The Sustainable Development Goals mandate that by 2030, all children should have access to quality early child development opportunities, healthcare and pre-primary education. Yet validated measures of ECD in low and middle income countries (LMICs) are rare. To address this gap, a Systematic Review (SR) of measures available to profile the…
Descriptors: Child Development, Early Experience, Measures (Individuals), Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Miles, Sandra; Fulbrook, Paul; Mainwaring-Mägi, Debra – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2018
Universal screening of very early school-age children (age 4-7 years) is important for early identification of learning problems that may require enhanced learning opportunity. In this context, use of standardized instruments is critical to obtain valid, reliable, and comparable assessment outcomes. A wide variety of standardized instruments is…
Descriptors: Standardized Tests, Screening Tests, Young Children, Usability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Quattrocchi, Mary; Sherrets, Steven – Psychology in the Schools, 1980
Although the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) involves modifications and a complete restandardization, the literature suggests that it remains very similar in nature to its predecessor, the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC). Individuals perform on the WISC-R largely the same as they do on the WISC. (Author)
Descriptors: Children, Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence Differences, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McGrew, Kevin; Murphy, Suzanne – Journal of School Psychology, 1995
Investigates the general factor and uniqueness characteristics of the individual tests of the Woodcock-Johnson Test of Cognitive Ability-Revised (WJTCA-R). Only 2 of the 19 WJTCA-R tests examined had low general factor loadings, while 2 had low uniqueness. All other tests had medium or high uniqueness. Discusses implications for clinical…
Descriptors: Academic Ability, Cognitive Ability, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Waddell, Deborah D. – Journal of School Psychology, 1980
A review of the technical data available on the 1972 norms edition of the Stanford-Binet demonstrates how inadequate these data are. The Stanford-Binet should not continue to be used in important decision making processes unless this weakness is corrected. (Author)
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Berk, Ronald A. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1982
Analyzed the reliability, abnormality, and validity of Verbal Performance discrepancy scores on the WISC-R in relation to clinical decision making about learning disabilities. Suggests the information of greatest value seems to be the magnitude of the discrepancy that is both reliable and valid for learning-disabled children. (Author)
Descriptors: Diagnostic Tests, Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Vernon, P. E. – British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1979
Changing ideas on intelligence testing and the heritability of intelligence are followed through a fifty-year period. Common criticisms of intelligence tests are examined, but it is concluded that intellectual tests will continue to be of value in diagnosing strengths and weaknesses, particularly of exceptional children. (Editor)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Historical Reviews, Intelligence Differences, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Glutting, Joseph J. – Journal of School Psychology, 1989
Introduces Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (SB4) as an attempt to revitalize Stanford-Binet by maintaining links with previous editions while simultaneously incorporating more recent developments found in other popular tests of intelligence. Discusses the SB4's theoretical foundation, materials and administration, scaling,…
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Models, Test Reliability, Test Use
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pfeiffer, Steven I.; Reddy, Linda A.; Kletzel, Jeffrey E.; Schmelzer, Elizabeth R.; Boyer, Lynn M. – School Psychology Quarterly, 2000
Surveys 354 nationally certified school psychologists on the perceived usefulness of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-III (WISC-III) in general and profile analysis in particular. Practitioners rated the WISC-III as very useful for determining diagnosis and educational placement, but less useful for developing instructional strategies…
Descriptors: Children, Clinical Diagnosis, Intelligence Tests, Profiles
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Davison, Mark L.; Kuang, Haijiang – School Psychology Quarterly, 2000
Reviews the articles in this issue of "School Psychology Quarterly" and briefly compares their methods for identifying profile patterns. Argues that subtest profile patterns on the existing generation of intelligence tests have modest reliability and weak relationships with achievement and diagnostic categorizations. (Contains 13…
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Intelligence Tests, Models, Profiles
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2