Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 7 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 9 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Information Analyses | 26 |
Journal Articles | 17 |
Reports - Evaluative | 8 |
Reports - Research | 8 |
Opinion Papers | 3 |
Books | 1 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Secondary Education | 2 |
Adult Education | 1 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Practitioners | 2 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
District of Columbia | 1 |
Japan | 1 |
Thailand | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Smirnova, Elizaveta – Language Learning in Higher Education, 2022
Syntactic complexity has been extensively approached in the fields of corpus linguistics and academic discourse studies. However, works focusing on disciplinary variation in terms of linguistic complexity and comparison of professional and novice academic writing are scarce. Addressing these issues is likely to have important implications for…
Descriptors: Phrase Structure, Writing (Composition), Syntax, English for Academic Purposes
Al-Harthi, Maha; Alshahrani, Hala J.; Hamed, Dalia M.; Ibrahim, Wesam M. A. – Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2022
This paper investigates the frequency and contextual uses of the metadiscoursal devices of evidentials, code glosses, hedges and boosters in four academic disciplines, namely, linguistics, literature, chemistry and medicine. Hyland and Hinkel's taxonomies of metadiscourse provided the search items. The data analyzed consisted of a corpus of forty…
Descriptors: Interdisciplinary Approach, Computational Linguistics, Cues, Context Effect
Kaldenberg, Erica R.; Ganzeveld, Paula; Hosp, John L.; Rodgers, Derek B. – Psychology in the Schools, 2016
Twenty-three single-subject studies aimed at improving the writing achievement of students identified as having a learning disability were analyzed meta-analytically. The effect size phi was used to compare the writing strategies. The dependent measures used to assess the efficacy of the interventions were also coded and reviewed. Results suggest…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Intervention, Writing Achievement, Writing Improvement
Demir, Cüneyt – Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 2017
Boosters are an important metadiscourse device for writers because it creates an emphatic impression in the reader. In addition, the competence of metadiscourse devices such as boosters is crucial in having native-fluency in academic writing. Therefore, this avoidance of using boosters may spawn foreignness in non-native writers' academic texts.…
Descriptors: English for Academic Purposes, Writing (Composition), Correlation, Teaching Methods
Darrington, Brett; Dousay, Tonia – TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 2014
One of the reasons that many secondary students fail English classes is because they are not motivated to write. This literature review was conducted to look into the use of multimodal works to increase the motivation for struggling students to write. Change theory was used to evaluate the benefits of multimodal works compared to more traditional…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Learning Modalities, Writing Skills, Secondary School Students
Yu, Shulin; Lee, Icy – Language Teaching, 2016
This article reviews research on peer feedback in second language (L2) writing published in the last decade (i.e. 2005-2014). We analyse first the theoretical underpinnings that have informed both peer feedback research and the pedagogical use of peer feedback in L2 writing instruction. We also provide a critical interpretation of existing peer…
Descriptors: Peer Relationship, Feedback (Response), Computer Mediated Communication, Cultural Awareness
Graham, Steve; Fishman, Evan J.; Reid, Robert; Hebert, Michael – Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 2016
Students with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorders (ADHD) frequently experience significant difficulty mastering basic academic skills. This meta-analysis focuses on one specific potential area of learning difficulties for these students: namely, writing. To identify the extent and depth of the potential writing challenges faced by students…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Meta Analysis, Academic Ability
Chen, Tsuiping – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2016
Some studies on technology-supported peer feedback in the writing classroom claim that it reduces the threatening atmosphere caused by face-to-face interaction and that the discourse patterns and language use in the electronic feedback are more flexible than in spoken discourse. Others present a negative view that the comments generated from…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Feedback (Response), Computer Assisted Instruction
Orton, Rebecca Rose – Online Submission, 2011
The English Language Institute at Gallaudet University participated in the Electronic Networks for Instruction (ENFI) Project in 1989. The purpose of this paper is to do a literature review of the ENFI Project within the scope of Gallaudet University and to contribute content that is specific to the English Language Institute. The research…
Descriptors: Deafness, College Instruction, College Students, Special Needs Students
Underwood, Virginia Allen – 1980
This paper explicates and compares theories of composition that use heuristic or problem solving procedures in order to determine what can logically be expected from the application of a particular heuristic during the composing process. The heuristic models examined include E. P. J. Corbett's selection from the classical topics; R. Young, A. L.…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Models, Rhetoric, Theories

Cooper, Charles R.; Odell, Lee – College English, 1980
Examines four approaches to evaluating writing, and notes the strengths and weaknesses of each. (RL)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education

Kostelnick, Charles – College Composition and Communication, 1989
Argues that comparing developments in the process approach to writing and the design methods movement sheds light on the evolution and future direction of the writing paradigm. Argues that sensitivity to the variety of writing tasks and social contexts is more effective than a single amorphous model. (RS)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Higher Education, Models, Process Approach (Writing)
Rosner, Mary – Technical Writing Teacher, 1983
Compares what 17 early technical writing textbooks have to say about style and audience with three modern texts. Concludes that the field of technical writing has not progressed very far in these two areas and calls for an increased emphasis on rhetorical invention, audience analysis, and style selection. (FL)
Descriptors: Audience Analysis, Comparative Analysis, Higher Education, Literary Styles

Pelletier, Pierre – International Journal of Instructional Media, 1992
Investigates the theoretical basis of the writing process and describes the possibilities of word processing as a tool to support it. Writing process models are compared; the advantages of word processing are discussed, highlighting the revision process; and a model for use by elementary and secondary teachers is suggested. (21 references) (LRW)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Instruction, Elementary Secondary Education, Models
Polin, Linda; White, Edward – Writing Program Administration, 1985
Draws from date collected in a study of effective college composition instruction to discover six instructional patterns: (1) the literature approach, (2) the peer workshop approach, (3) the individualized workshop approach, (4) the text-based modes approach, (5) the basic skills approach, and (6) the service course approach. (FL)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Educational Philosophy, Higher Education, Program Effectiveness
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1 | 2