Descriptor
| Drug Use Testing | 23 |
| Court Litigation | 17 |
| Athletes | 10 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 9 |
| Student Rights | 9 |
| Federal Courts | 8 |
| Privacy | 8 |
| Search and Seizure | 8 |
| Higher Education | 7 |
| Public Schools | 7 |
| College Athletics | 6 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 23 |
| Opinion Papers | 23 |
| Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 6 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - General | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 5 |
| Administrators | 4 |
| Policymakers | 4 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Fourth Amendment | 3 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedGriffin, Stephen O.; Keller, Adrienne; Cohn, Alan – Public Personnel Management, 2001
Although employee drug testing is widespread among private employers, the development of programs in the public sector has been slower due to constitutional law constraints. A qualitative approach presenting various participant perspectives may aid in developing an employee drug testing program. (Contains 41 references/notes.) (JOW)
Descriptors: Drug Use Testing, Higher Education, Program Development, Public Policy
Peer reviewedNelson, Richard R. – Monthly Labor Review, 1990
Discusses major laws enacted on a variety of subjects, including minimum wage, parental leave, drugs and AIDS testing, and door-to-door sales by children. A state-by-state summary of labor legislation is included. (Author)
Descriptors: Child Labor, Drug Use Testing, Labor Legislation, Leaves of Absence
Bjorklun, Eugene C. – West's Education Law Quarterly, 1993
Examines recent court decisions regarding the legality of drug-testing programs aimed at student athletes. Concludes the drug-testing programs will be upheld if the program is narrowly drawn with regard to the student population; aims at limited and achievable goals; involves random selection of students for testing; and imposes penalties…
Descriptors: Athletes, Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing, High School Students
Peer reviewedStader, David L.; Francis, Dannie B. – Clearing House, 2003
Examines litigation involving academic freedom, expressive freedom, and drug testing as examples of the shifting balance between teacher rights and school board authority. Concludes that balancing teacher rights with community expectations is difficult, and the scales of justice may not always tip in favor of a teacher's rights. (SG)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedJournal of Law and Education, 1996
The Supreme Court, in "Vernonia School District 47J versus Acton," ruled that a school district's policy authorizing random urinalysis drug testing of student-athletes did not violate the Fourth Amendment. Discusses the decision and why such a policy is permissible under the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches…
Descriptors: Athletes, Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing, Extramural Athletics
Peer reviewedPallone, Nathaniel J. – Journal of Offender Counseling, Services & Rehabilitation, 1990
Suggests ways that drug use/abuse might be associated with felony crime and discusses discrepancies of investigations into drug use/abuse and crime. Asserts that there is insufficient evidence to establish differential effects of specific substances that produce biochemical effects on acceleration of particular types of felony crime. (Author/PVV)
Descriptors: Biochemistry, Crime, Criminals, Drug Abuse
Peer reviewedOrr, Ginger – Journal of Law and Education, 2000
Discusses the importance of drug-testing policies for educators by analyzing the recent Sixth Circuit Court of Appeal's decision in "Knox v. Knox." Concludes that mandatory drug testing for educators in safety-sensitive positions will not infringe on the constitutional rights of school employees. (Contains 30 footnotes.) (MLF)
Descriptors: Boards of Education, Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedGibbs, Annette – West's Education Law Reporter, 1991
Mandatory testing of college and university athletes has met with mixed success not only in combating substance abuse but in legal arguments. Students have claimed that drug testing violates their constitutional rights of equal protection, protection against unreasonable search and seizure, and due process, and is a gross invasion of privacy.…
Descriptors: Athletes, College Athletics, Court Litigation, Drug Education
Pittman, Andrew T.; Slough, Mark R. – West's Education Law Quarterly, 1996
Addresses the Fourth Amendment constitutional challenges facing high school student-athlete drug testing programs and applies the findings in the U.S. Supreme Court decision in the "Vernonia versus Acton" case, the first drug-testing case involving high school student athletes to be decided by the Court, by recommending 12 safeguards…
Descriptors: Athletes, Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing, Federal Courts
Peer reviewedJacobs, James B.; And Others – Teachers College Record, 1992
Discusses (1) school drug testing and reasons why schools should have embraced it; (2) educational systems' responses to student drug testing and reasons schools have not adopted it; and (3) school social organization and politics accounting for schools' deploring drug use yet ignoring potentially useful technology. Four responses are appended.…
Descriptors: Drug Use Testing, Elementary Secondary Education, Illegal Drug Use, Politics of Education
Peer reviewedSultanik, Jeffrey T. – Journal of Law and Education, 1990
In response to an earlier article by Eugene Lincoln, presents two hypothetical cases that respectively deal with the possible effects of drug use on school premises and with a policy governing mandatory urine testing for student athletes. Cites factors that should be incorporated in any mandatory drug testing policy. (MLF)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Athletics, Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing
Peer reviewedEvans, John M. – Journal of Law and Education, 1990
The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) drug-testing program affects thousands of collegiate athletes. This article examines the web of testing procedures and raises questions about the legitimate interest of the program; focuses on federal and state constitutional limitations; and suggests some ways to correct operating procedures.…
Descriptors: College Athletics, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing
Peer reviewedTeagarden, C. Claude – West's Education Law Reporter, 1991
Examines the National Collegiate Athletic Association's drug testing program of student-athletes and relevant legal decisions. Concludes that each individual urinalysis search, not based on suspicion, is a violation of the student-athlete's privacy and is an unreasonable search in violation of the Fourth Amendment. (100 references) (MLF)
Descriptors: Athletes, College Athletics, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation
Bartlett, Larry D. – West's Education Law Quarterly, 1993
Reviews court rulings on the issue of school authority over out-of-school conduct of student athletes and others involved in extracurricular activities. Questions why good conduct rules can be so easily justified to the satisfaction of judges, although the problems with which they are designed to deal continue to exist and grow. (MLF)
Descriptors: Alcohol Abuse, Athletes, Court Litigation, Discipline Policy
Brown, Valerie L. – West's Education Law Quarterly, 1996
Addresses the question of institutional duty of care in college sports. Asks if the Supreme Court's decision in "Vernonia," which held that random, suspicionless urinalysis testing of student-athletes is allowed, gives college officials a free hand in conducting random, suspicionless searches for college athletes and nonathletes alike.…
Descriptors: Athletes, College Athletics, Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2

