NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 30 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lincoln, Yvonna S.; Guba, Egon G. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986
The emergence of a new, naturalistic, paradigm of inquiry has led to a demand for rigorous criteria that meet traditional standards of inquiry. Two sets are suggested, one of which, the "trustworthiness" criteria, parallels conventional criteria, while the second, "authenticity" criteria, is implied directly by new paradigm…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Models, Observation, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wortman, Paul M.; And Others – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1980
What a realistic training program should require, given a broad scope of research methodology, is discussed. Considering the core of evaluation research training, the diversity of methodologies raises issues about what is to be taught and how the involvement of students in actual projects is discussed. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Curriculum, Evaluators, Graduate Study, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Brown, Elizabeth D. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1980
Considered fundamentally a scientific enterprise, evaluation research also requires artistic skills. The latter are essential to in-house evaluators, more so than to extrainstitutional evaluators. A training model is suggested. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Evaluators, Interprofessional Relationship, Models, Professional Training
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cordray, David S. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986
The role of human judgment in the development and synthesis of evidence has not been adequately developed or acknowledged within quasi-experimental analysis. Corrective solutions need to confront the fact that causal analysis within complex environments will require a more active assessment that entails reasoning and statistical modeling.…
Descriptors: Evaluative Thinking, Models, Program Effectiveness, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Yeaton, William; Sechrest, Lee – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1987
In no-difference research, no differences are found among groups or conditions. This article summarizes the existing commentary on such research. The characteristics of no-difference research, its acceptance by the research community, strategies for conducting such studies, and its centrality within the experimental and nonexperimental paradigms…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Literature Reviews, Models, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cook, Thomas D. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1993
A practical theory is offered for probing external validity, the generalization of causal relationships. This alternative theory is built around five principles abstracted from research on construct validation. It emphasizes purposive sampling for theoretical ends rather than random sampling to represent a population. (SLD)
Descriptors: Causal Models, Construct Validity, Generalization, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bickman, Leonard – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1987
Ten functions of program theory are reviewed: contributing to social science knowledge; assisting policymakers, discriminating between theory failure and program failure, identifying the problem and target group, providing program implementation description, uncovering unintended effects, specifying intervening variables, improving formative use…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Models, Problem Solving
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Guba, Egon G. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1987
Two forms of naturalistic evaluation have appeared within the past decade: (1) a collection of qualitative techniques that are complimentary with conventional quantitative methods; and (2) an alternative paradigm that emphasizes the negotiation of multiple socially constructed realities, interdependence of facts and values, and the emergent…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rindskopf, David – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986
Modeling the process by which participants are selected into groups, rather than adjusting for preexisting group differences, provides the basis for several new approaches to the analysis of data from nonrandomized studies. Econometric approaches, the propensity scores approach, and the relative assignment variable approach to the modeling of…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Experimental Groups, Intelligence Quotient, Mathematical Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Reichardt, Charles; Gollob, Harry – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986
Causal models often omit variables that should be included, use variables that are measured fallibly, and ignore time lags. Such practices can lead to severely biased estimates of effects. The discussion explains these biases and shows how to take them into account. (Author)
Descriptors: Effect Size, Error of Measurement, High Schools, Mathematical Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hedges, Larry V. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1984
The adequacy of traditional effect size measures for research synthesis is challenged. Analogues to analysis of variance and multiple regression analysis for effect sizes are presented. The importance of tests for the consistency of effect sizes in interpreting results, and problems in obtaining well-specified models for meta-analysis are…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Effect Size, Mathematical Models, Meta Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gerhard, Ronald J. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1981
The need for and applicability of general systems theory in human services evaluation is discussed. The role of evaluation in human services agencies is described and the necessity of combining the programs to be evaluated and the evaluation process itself in a single unifying conceptual model is demonstrated. (Author/AL)
Descriptors: Change Strategies, Evaluation Methods, Human Services, Integrated Activities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shadish, William R., Ed. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1994
This special issue deals with the preparation of professional evaluators. Evaluation is considered as a profession that warrants specialized training. Aspects of necessary training and descriptions of current programs are discussed. (SLD)
Descriptors: Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Scheirer, Mary Ann – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1987
Program theory and implementation process theory contribute, respectively, to specifying the what and the why of program delivery. This article discusses the relationship between these two theories and the types of data collection methods that can be derived from each in order to contribute to more comprehensive evaluation designs. (JAZ)
Descriptors: Data Collection, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Thompson, Bruce W. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1981
To enable decision makers to become more aware of the levels of confidence that can be placed in the results of particular computerized decision models, methods for establishing confidence levels are discussed. The U.S. General Accounting Office has developed criteria and review procedures for evaluating computerized policy analysis models.…
Descriptors: Computer Oriented Programs, Decision Making, Evaluation Methods, Federal Programs
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2