NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Miriam Leary; Wei Fang; Andrew Layne; Beth Nardella; Lori Sherlock; Emily Ryan; Jim Thomas; Brian Leary; Lena Maynor – Advances in Physiology Education, 2024
Cohort scheduling intentionally places students in the same sections of several classes (e.g., biology, algebra, and writing) with a consistent peer group and is typically done for small groups (<30 students) to enable better interaction among students. The goal of this study was to compare cohort scheduling to traditional scheduling methods…
Descriptors: College Freshmen, Scheduling, Homogeneous Grouping, Class Organization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Marklund, Sixten – Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1984
Discusses development of pupil grouping in European compulsory education into two opposite class organization types, mixed ability classes and ability-grouped classes. Categorizes the types along two dimensions with three program types and three grouping types, yielding nine teaching categories. Discusses comparative results of streaming and mixed…
Descriptors: Ability Grouping, Class Organization, Comparative Analysis, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pratt, David – Research in Rural Education, 1986
Summarizes evidence from experimental research, ethnology, anthropology, and history about merits of multiage classrooms. Indicates studies show no consistent benefits of age segregation and some affective and social advantages from multiage grouping. Concludes that multiage and multigrade classrooms are socially and psychologically healthy…
Descriptors: Age Grade Placement, Class Organization, Classroom Environment, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Slavin, Robert E. – Educational Leadership, 1988
Certain grouping arrangements in elementary and secondary schools appear to be instructionally effective for students, but the psychological drawbacks may offset any advantages. The relative benefits and disadvantages of within-class grouping and between-class grouping are discussed, along with the problems with ability grouping. (TE)
Descriptors: Class Organization, Elementary Secondary Education, Grouping (Instructional Purposes), Heterogeneous Grouping
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Teno, Kevin M. – Gifted Child Today, 2000
This article examines cluster grouping as a viable option for meeting the needs of gifted and talented students. It also discusses the strengths and weaknesses of cluster grouping from the perspective of conclusions obtained through the implementation of cluster grouping in an elementary school district. (Contains references.) (CR)
Descriptors: Class Organization, Cluster Grouping, Elementary Education, Gifted
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Goldring, Ellen B. – Journal of Educational Research, 1990
This article presents a meta-analysis of studies of the effects of special homogeneous classes versus regular heterogeneous classes on achievement and nonachievement outcomes of gifted students. The principal findings indicate that the gifted students in special classes achieved more than their gifted counterparts in regular classes. (Author/IAH)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Class Organization, Educational Research, Effect Size
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Winebrenner, Susan; Devlin, Barbara – TEACHING Exceptional Children, 1998
Using a question-and-answer format, this research digest discusses using cluster grouping in regular classes to teach gifted students. The learning needs of gifted students, benefits of cluster grouping, the effects on peers, identification of students for the cluster group, and specific skills that are needed by cluster teachers are addressed.…
Descriptors: Class Organization, Classroom Techniques, Cluster Grouping, Educational Methods