Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Cognitive Tests | 7 |
Learning Modalities | 7 |
Cognitive Style | 5 |
Anatomy | 2 |
Cognitive Processes | 2 |
Foreign Countries | 2 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Recall (Psychology) | 2 |
Scores | 2 |
Spatial Ability | 2 |
Student Characteristics | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Anatomical Sciences Education | 2 |
Educational Psychology: An… | 1 |
European Journal of… | 1 |
Journal of Medical Education | 1 |
Physical Educator | 1 |
School Psychology Review | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 7 |
Reports - Research | 5 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Researchers | 2 |
Administrators | 1 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
Canada | 1 |
United Kingdom (Great Britain) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Canfield Learning Styles… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Sveistrup, Michelle A.; Langlois, Jean; Wilson, Timothy D. – Anatomical Sciences Education, 2023
Spatial abilities (SAs) are cognitive resources used to mentally manipulate representations of objects to solve problems. Haptic abilities (HAs) represent tactile interactions with real-world objects transforming somatic information into mental representations. Both are proposed to be factors in anatomy education, yet relationships between SAs and…
Descriptors: Spatial Ability, Tactual Perception, Anatomy, Science Education
Van Nuland, Sonya E.; Rogers, Kem A. – Anatomical Sciences Education, 2017
In the anatomical sciences, e-learning tools have become a critical component of teaching anatomy when physical space and cadaveric resources are limited. However, studies that use empirical evidence to compare their efficacy to visual-kinesthetic learning modalities are scarce. The study examined how a visual-kinesthetic experience, involving a…
Descriptors: Electronic Learning, Anatomy, College Students, Medical Students

Pettigrew, Frank – Physical Educator, 1988
Results are reported from a study which sought to measure learning preferences and identify variations and gender differences associated with the learning styles of a sample of 213 junior high school students. The study found a wide range of learning styles with significant gender differences present. (IAH)
Descriptors: Cognitive Style, Cognitive Tests, Junior High Schools, Learning Modalities

Scott, Norval; And Others – Journal of Medical Education, 1981
The effects of matching, or mismatching, third-year medical students by cognitive style and instructional mode were studied. Following an instructional period, students were administered an inventory of instruction, a simulation game, and a multiple-choice posttest. Results showed few effects favoring matching cognitive style with instructional…
Descriptors: Cognitive Style, Cognitive Tests, Graduate Medical Students, Higher Education

Moore, David K. – School Psychology Review, 1985
The Learning Efficiency Test (LET) assesses a subject's learning modality preference. The reviewer cites the instrument's problems with reliability, diagnostic validity, and predictive validity. The need for better documentation of the test's validity and reliability is suggested. (DWH)
Descriptors: Auditory Perception, Cognitive Style, Cognitive Tests, Elementary Secondary Education

Riding, Richard; Caine, Tracey – Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 1993
Reports on a preliminary study of cognitive style and performance of 182 secondary students on the British General Certificate of Secondary Education. Finds that students who tested at an intermediate position on both dimensions of the Wholist-Analytic cognitive style measure did best on the test. (CFR)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Cognitive Style, Cognitive Tests, Educational Assessment

Dochy, Filip J. R. C.; Alexander, Patricia A. – European Journal of Psychology of Education, 1995
Reviews the current literature concerning prior knowledge in an attempt to clarify problems with the terminology. Identifies the three main problems: lack of definition or vagueness, nominal versus real definitions, and different names/same constructs or same name/different constructs. Includes a conceptual map of prior knowledge terminology. (MJP)
Descriptors: Cognitive Mapping, Cognitive Measurement, Cognitive Processes, Cognitive Structures