Publication Date
In 2025 | 11 |
Since 2024 | 27 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 107 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 203 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 335 |
Descriptor
Computer Assisted Testing | 412 |
Scoring | 328 |
Evaluation Methods | 88 |
Foreign Countries | 87 |
Scoring Rubrics | 76 |
Automation | 73 |
Second Language Learning | 72 |
Writing Evaluation | 72 |
Language Tests | 67 |
English (Second Language) | 66 |
Essays | 66 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Attali, Yigal | 9 |
Williamson, David M. | 6 |
Bejar, Isaac I. | 5 |
Bridgeman, Brent | 5 |
Ramineni, Chaitanya | 5 |
Xi, Xiaoming | 5 |
Zechner, Klaus | 5 |
Bennett, Randy Elliot | 4 |
Evanini, Keelan | 4 |
Mulholland, Matthew | 4 |
Newhouse, C. Paul | 4 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Location
Australia | 9 |
China | 9 |
Iran | 6 |
Netherlands | 6 |
Taiwan | 6 |
Japan | 5 |
United Kingdom | 5 |
Germany | 4 |
Spain | 4 |
California | 3 |
Canada | 3 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
Family Educational Rights and… | 1 |
Health Insurance Portability… | 1 |
Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Casabianca, Jodi M.; Donoghue, John R.; Shin, Hyo Jeong; Chao, Szu-Fu; Choi, Ikkyu – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2023
Using item-response theory to model rater effects provides an alternative solution for rater monitoring and diagnosis, compared to using standard performance metrics. In order to fit such models, the ratings data must be sufficiently connected in order to estimate rater effects. Due to popular rating designs used in large-scale testing scenarios,…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Alternative Assessment, Evaluators, Research Problems
Ormerod, Christopher; Lottridge, Susan; Harris, Amy E.; Patel, Milan; van Wamelen, Paul; Kodeswaran, Balaji; Woolf, Sharon; Young, Mackenzie – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2023
We introduce a short answer scoring engine made up of an ensemble of deep neural networks and a Latent Semantic Analysis-based model to score short constructed responses for a large suite of questions from a national assessment program. We evaluate the performance of the engine and show that the engine achieves above-human-level performance on a…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Artificial Intelligence, Semantics
Dhini, Bachriah Fatwa; Girsang, Abba Suganda; Sufandi, Unggul Utan; Kurniawati, Heny – Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 2023
Purpose: The authors constructed an automatic essay scoring (AES) model in a discussion forum where the result was compared with scores given by human evaluators. This research proposes essay scoring, which is conducted through two parameters, semantic and keyword similarities, using a SentenceTransformers pre-trained model that can construct the…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Writing Evaluation, Essays
Ramnarain-Seetohul, Vidasha; Bassoo, Vandana; Rosunally, Yasmine – Education and Information Technologies, 2022
In automated essay scoring (AES) systems, similarity techniques are used to compute the score for student answers. Several methods to compute similarity have emerged over the years. However, only a few of them have been widely used in the AES domain. This work shows the findings of a ten-year review on similarity techniques applied in AES systems…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Essays, Scoring, Automation
Chan, Kinnie Kin Yee; Bond, Trevor; Yan, Zi – Language Testing, 2023
We investigated the relationship between the scores assigned by an Automated Essay Scoring (AES) system, the Intelligent Essay Assessor (IEA), and grades allocated by trained, professional human raters to English essay writing by instigating two procedures novel to written-language assessment: the logistic transformation of AES raw scores into…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Essays, Scoring, Scores
Selcuk Acar; Peter Organisciak; Denis Dumas – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2025
In this three-study investigation, we applied various approaches to score drawings created in response to both Form A and Form B of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-Figural (broadly TTCT-F) as well as the Multi-Trial Creative Ideation task (MTCI). We focused on TTCT-F in Study 1, and utilizing a random forest classifier, we achieved 79% and…
Descriptors: Scoring, Computer Assisted Testing, Models, Correlation
Peter Baldwin; Victoria Yaneva; Kai North; Le An Ha; Yiyun Zhou; Alex J. Mechaber; Brian E. Clauser – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
Recent developments in the use of large-language models have led to substantial improvements in the accuracy of content-based automated scoring of free-text responses. The reported accuracy levels suggest that automated systems could have widespread applicability in assessment. However, before they are used in operational testing, other aspects of…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Scoring, Computational Linguistics, Accuracy
Olivera-Aguilar, Margarita; Lee, Hee-Sun; Pallant, Amy; Belur, Vinetha; Mulholland, Matthew; Liu, Ou Lydia – ETS Research Report Series, 2022
This study uses a computerized formative assessment system that provides automated scoring and feedback to help students write scientific arguments in a climate change curriculum. We compared the effect of contextualized versus generic automated feedback on students' explanations of scientific claims and attributions of uncertainty to those…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Formative Evaluation, Automation, Scoring
Swapna Haresh Teckwani; Amanda Huee-Ping Wong; Nathasha Vihangi Luke; Ivan Cherh Chiet Low – Advances in Physiology Education, 2024
The advent of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and Gemini, has significantly impacted the educational landscape, offering unique opportunities for learning and assessment. In the realm of written assessment grading, traditionally viewed as a laborious and subjective process, this study sought to…
Descriptors: Accuracy, Reliability, Computational Linguistics, Standards
Jonas Flodén – British Educational Research Journal, 2025
This study compares how the generative AI (GenAI) large language model (LLM) ChatGPT performs in grading university exams compared to human teachers. Aspects investigated include consistency, large discrepancies and length of answer. Implications for higher education, including the role of teachers and ethics, are also discussed. Three…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Artificial Intelligence, Comparative Testing, Scoring
Uto, Masaki; Aomi, Itsuki; Tsutsumi, Emiko; Ueno, Maomi – IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2023
In automated essay scoring (AES), essays are automatically graded without human raters. Many AES models based on various manually designed features or various architectures of deep neural networks (DNNs) have been proposed over the past few decades. Each AES model has unique advantages and characteristics. Therefore, rather than using a single-AES…
Descriptors: Prediction, Scores, Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring
William Orwig; Emma R. Edenbaum; Joshua D. Greene; Daniel L. Schacter – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2024
Recent developments in computerized scoring via semantic distance have provided automated assessments of verbal creativity. Here, we extend past work, applying computational linguistic approaches to characterize salient features of creative text. We hypothesize that, in addition to semantic diversity, the degree to which a story includes…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Creativity, Computational Linguistics
Stefan Ruseti; Ionut Paraschiv; Mihai Dascalu; Danielle S. McNamara – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2024
Automated Essay Scoring (AES) is a well-studied problem in Natural Language Processing applied in education. Solutions vary from handcrafted linguistic features to large Transformer-based models, implying a significant effort in feature extraction and model implementation. We introduce a novel Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) pipeline…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Automation, Essays
Buczak, Philip; Huang, He; Forthmann, Boris; Doebler, Philipp – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2023
Traditionally, researchers employ human raters for scoring responses to creative thinking tasks. Apart from the associated costs this approach entails two potential risks. First, human raters can be subjective in their scoring behavior (inter-rater-variance). Second, individual raters are prone to inconsistent scoring patterns…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Automation, Creative Thinking
Yuan, Lu; Huang, Yingshi; Li, Shuhang; Chen, Ping – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2023
Online calibration is a key technology for item calibration in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) and has been widely used in various forms of CAT, including unidimensional CAT, multidimensional CAT (MCAT), CAT with polytomously scored items, and cognitive diagnostic CAT. However, as multidimensional and polytomous assessment data become more…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Computation, Test Items