NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)2
Since 2006 (last 20 years)15
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 47 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Boyle, Brendan; Mitchell, Rebecca; McDonnell, Anthony; Sharma, Narender; Biswas, Kumar; Nicholas, Stephen – Education & Training, 2020
Purpose: This paper explores the challenge of "fuzzy" assessment criteria and feedback with a view to aiding student learning. The paper untangles three guiding principles as mechanisms to enhance the effectiveness of assessment and feedback through overcoming the inherent challenges which stem from tacit judgement during assessment.…
Descriptors: College Students, Student Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Willis, Chris; Ingle, W. Kyle – Leadership and Policy in Schools, 2018
A small number of districts in Ohio from a variety of locales have adopted merit pay provisions. Using Springer's (2009) taxonomy of teacher compensation, we analyzed compensation provisions of these districts. We asked: What are the characteristics of these districts? What criteria are used to determine merit? Who is determining who receives…
Descriptors: Merit Pay, Teacher Salaries, Compensation (Remuneration), School Districts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fluckiger, Bev; Lovett, Susan; Dempster, Neil – Professional Development in Education, 2014
How to best address the professional learning needs of those aspiring to leadership roles in schools is a crucial issue. Robust evaluation practices are needed to determine the quality of current provisions and to identify where improvements can be made. This paper considers the quality of professional learning programmes using a set of 10…
Descriptors: Leadership Training, Educational Quality, Professional Education, Leadership Role
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ellis, Gary D. – Schole: A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education, 2014
This paper is a case study. It tells the story of the process that the Council on Accreditation for Parks, Recreation, Tourism and Related Professions beta test site created its learning outcomes assessment program. A planning process was used that has evolved from quality management philosophy and practice: DMADV. Use of DMADV required precise…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Outcome Measures, Accreditation (Institutions), Outcomes of Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Bustos, Antonio; Arostegui, Jose Luis – Quality of Higher Education, 2012
Universities in Europe have been playing an increasingly important role in the institutional evaluation of political and social systems for the last thirty years. Their major contribution to those processes of accountability has been to add methods and safeguards of evaluative research. In this paper we report an illustration of how evaluative…
Descriptors: Research Administration, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Social Services
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Miner, Jeremy T. – Research Management Review, 2011
After months of waiting, the grant reviews came back: "excellent," "excellent," and "fair." What?! How can this be? Why is the third review so out of line with the first two? On more than one occasion a principal investigator (PI) has been frustrated not only by a negative funding decision but more so by the accompanying reviewer evaluation forms…
Descriptors: Research Administration, Grants, Feedback (Response), Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gallo, Ann Marie; Carr, Michael T.; Gallo, Joseph A. – Strategies: A Journal for Physical and Sport Educators, 2010
Designing and implementing assessment instruments are ongoing challenges for physical educators. The initial design phase includes asking the question, "What do I want the students to know and/or be able to do?" Seemingly, the question is direct and should lead to a concrete answer. In addition to designing assessment instruments, one of the most…
Descriptors: Physical Education, Racquet Sports, Evaluation Criteria, Teaching Assistants
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Pukelis, Kestutis – Quality of Higher Education, 2011
This article presents generalisations drawn from experience gained designing and renewing study programmes so that the use of learning outcomes became the underlying principle of curriculum organisation. Conceptions of a purpose (profile), aim and outcomes of a study programme are presented, their formulation requirements are discussed and…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Curriculum Development, Credits, Instructional Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cochrane, Thomas – Research in Learning Technology, 2012
Having implemented and evaluated over 35 mlearning projects in a variety of contexts in higher education over the past 6 years the researcher is ready to share the untold secret: not all mlearning projects succeed! This article critiques three of the researcher's mlearning projects that can be classed as "failures" and compares them to successful…
Descriptors: Longitudinal Studies, Action Research, Participatory Research, Program Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Stasiunaitiene, Egle; Norkute, Odeta – Quality of Higher Education, 2011
In this article, relevance of practice during university studies is highlighted, as well as the main stages of its organisation, qualitative parameters, as well as criteria and indicators that validate them are defined. Discussion on the idea that taking into consideration qualitative parameters of organising practice as a component of studies…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Higher Education, Education Work Relationship, Theory Practice Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Savaya, Riki; Spiro, Shimon; Elran-Barak, Roni – American Journal of Evaluation, 2008
The article reports on the findings of a comparative case study of six projects that operated in Israel between 1980 and 2000. The study findings identify characteristics of the programs, the host organizations, and the social and political environment, which differentiated programs that are sustained from those that are not. The findings reaffirm…
Descriptors: Theory Practice Relationship, Foreign Countries, Case Studies, Leadership
Powell, David B. – Popular Computing, 1984
In order to help users make informed decisions when buying communications software, this article suggests that buyers consider communications software compatibility; software protocols for data transmission; software products offering compatibility with Telenet, Prestel, and Ethernet/XTEN; specific intended applications; and specialized features…
Descriptors: Computer Software, Decision Making, Evaluation Criteria, Microcomputers
Sherry, Mark – Phi Delta Kappan, 1992
Although many proposals were disappointing and the New American Schools Development Corporation (NASDC) did not achieve its multimillion dollar funding goal, the contest sparked an unprecedented collaborative process across the nation. The evaluation and selection processes were problematical, as judges seemed to favor well-known educators with a…
Descriptors: Educational Change, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Political Influences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Miller, Richard I. – Higher Education, 1988
A discussion of merit pay programs for college faculty looks at the advantages and disadvantages of such systems, the design of some operational programs, key issues in making merit pay awards, and components of effective systems. Alternative ways to recognize differences in performance are also considered. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education, Merit Pay
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Patterson, Janice – Theory into Practice, 1983
When looking at diverse theories of intelligence, there are four common notions to guide software developers: (1) educational software must be sensitive to individual differences; (2) programs must motivate students; (3) software must reflect real world problems; and (4) software should receive careful empirical evaluation. (JMK)
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Individual Differences
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4