Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 6 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 12 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 31 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 34 |
Descriptor
Evaluation Methods | 34 |
Randomized Controlled Trials | 34 |
Comparative Analysis | 8 |
Program Evaluation | 8 |
Correlation | 7 |
Intervention | 7 |
Statistical Analysis | 6 |
Educational Research | 5 |
Effect Size | 5 |
Research Design | 5 |
Scores | 5 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Bradshaw, Catherine P. | 2 |
Debnam, Katrina J. | 2 |
Pas, Elise T. | 2 |
Alan Shiell | 1 |
Alves, Hélio | 1 |
Amanda Timmerman | 1 |
Amirian, Mohammad Reza | 1 |
Angela C. Webster | 1 |
Angie Barba | 1 |
Anna Lene Seidler | 1 |
Armijo-Olivo, Susan | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 34 |
Reports - Research | 24 |
Information Analyses | 6 |
Reports - Evaluative | 5 |
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Secondary Education | 6 |
Elementary Education | 5 |
High Schools | 2 |
Junior High Schools | 2 |
Middle Schools | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Grade 10 | 1 |
Grade 11 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Grade 8 | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
Vineland Adaptive Behavior… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Weibel, Stephanie; Popp, Maria; Reis, Stefanie; Skoetz, Nicole; Garner, Paul; Sydenham, Emma – Research Synthesis Methods, 2023
Evidence synthesis findings depend on the assumption that the included studies follow good clinical practice and results are not fabricated or false. Studies which are problematic due to scientific misconduct, poor research practice, or honest error may distort evidence synthesis findings. Authors of evidence synthesis need transparent mechanisms…
Descriptors: Identification, Randomized Controlled Trials, Integrity, Evaluation Methods
Kylie E. Hunter; Mason Aberoumand; Sol Libesman; James X. Sotiropoulos; Jonathan G. Williams; Jannik Aagerup; Rui Wang; Ben W. Mol; Wentao Li; Angie Barba; Nipun Shrestha; Angela C. Webster; Anna Lene Seidler – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
Increasing concerns about the trustworthiness of research have prompted calls to scrutinise studies' Individual Participant Data (IPD), but guidance on how to do this was lacking. To address this, we developed the IPD Integrity Tool to screen randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for integrity issues. Development of the tool involved a literature…
Descriptors: Integrity, Randomized Controlled Trials, Participant Characteristics, Computer Software
Yuan Tian; Xi Yang; Suhail A. Doi; Luis Furuya-Kanamori; Lifeng Lin; Joey S. W. Kwong; Chang Xu – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
RobotReviewer is a tool for automatically assessing the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials, but there is limited evidence of its reliability. We evaluated the agreement between RobotReviewer and humans regarding the risk of bias assessment based on 1955 randomized controlled trials. The risk of bias in these trials was assessed via two…
Descriptors: Risk, Randomized Controlled Trials, Classification, Robotics
Miriam Hattle; Joie Ensor; Katie Scandrett; Marienke van Middelkoop; Danielle A. van der Windt; Melanie A. Holden; Richard D. Riley – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis projects obtain, harmonise, and synthesise original data from multiple studies. Many IPD meta-analyses of randomised trials are initiated to identify treatment effect modifiers at the individual level, thus requiring statistical modelling of interactions between treatment effect and participant-level…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trials, Outcomes of Treatment, Evaluation Methods
Huey T. Chen; Liliana Morosanu; Victor H. Chen – Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 2024
The Campbellian validity typology has been used as a foundation for outcome evaluation and for developing evidence-based interventions for decades. As such, randomized control trials were preferred for outcome evaluation. However, some evaluators disagree with the validity typology's argument that randomized controlled trials as the best design…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Systems Approach, Intervention, Evidence Based Practice
Amanda Timmerman; Vasiliki Totsika; Valerie Lye; Laura Crane; Audrey Linden; Elizabeth Pellicano – Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 2025
Autistic people are more likely to have co-occurring mental health conditions compared to the general population, and mental health interventions have been identified as a top research priority by autistic people and the wider autism community. Autistic adults have also communicated that quality of life is the outcome that matters most to them in…
Descriptors: Adults, Autism Spectrum Disorders, Quality of Life, Randomized Controlled Trials
Katherine Pye; Hannah Jackson; Teresa Iacono; Alan Shiell – Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2024
Many autistic children access some form of early intervention, but little is known about the value for money of different programs. We completed a scoping review of full economic evaluations of early interventions for autistic children and/or their families. We identified nine studies and reviewed their methods and quality. Most studies involved…
Descriptors: Economics, Early Intervention, Autism Spectrum Disorders, Children
Maynard, Rebecca A.; Baelen, Rebecca N.; Fein, David; Souvanna, Phomdaen – Grantee Submission, 2022
This article offers a case example of how experimental evaluation methods can be coupled with principles of design-based implementation research (DBIR), improvement science (IS), and rapid-cycle evaluation (RCE) methods to provide relatively quick, low-cost, credible assessments of strategies designed to improve programs, policies, or practices.…
Descriptors: Program Improvement, Evaluation Methods, Efficiency, Young Adults
Proctor, Tanja; Zimmermann, Samuel; Seide, Svenja; Kieser, Meinhard – Research Synthesis Methods, 2022
During drug development, a biomarker is sometimes identified as separating a patient population into those with more and those with less benefit from evaluated treatments. Consequently, later studies might be targeted, while earlier ones are performed in mixed patient populations. This poses a challenge in evidence synthesis, especially if only…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Meta Analysis, Patients, Medical Research
Piepho, Hans-Peter; Madden, Laurence V. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2022
Network meta-analysis is a popular method to synthesize the information obtained in a systematic review of studies (e.g., randomized clinical trials) involving subsets of multiple treatments of interest. The dominant method of analysis employs within-study information on treatment contrasts and integrates this over a network of studies. One…
Descriptors: Medical Research, Meta Analysis, Networks, Drug Therapy
Bradshaw, Catherine P.; Pas, Elise T.; Debnam, Katrina J.; Johnson, Sarah Lindstrom – Remedial and Special Education, 2021
This study presents findings from a 58 high-school group-randomized controlled trial testing the effectiveness of training in a multitiered system of supports for behavior (MTSS-B) framework, which was leveraged to reduce students' risk for emotional and behavior disorders. The trial tested the impact of MTSS-B, which included (a) training in the…
Descriptors: Randomized Controlled Trials, Positive Behavior Supports, High School Students, Program Effectiveness
Lortie-Forgues, Hugues; Inglis, Matthew – Educational Researcher, 2019
In this response, we first show that Simpson's proposed analysis answers a different and less interesting question than ours. We then justify the choice of prior for our Bayes factors calculations, but we also demonstrate that the substantive conclusions of our article are not substantially affected by varying this choice.
Descriptors: Randomized Controlled Trials, Bayesian Statistics, Educational Research, Program Evaluation
Armijo-Olivo, Susan; Craig, Rodger; Campbell, Sandy – Research Synthesis Methods, 2020
Background: Evidence from new health technologies is growing, along with demands for evidence to inform policy decisions, creating challenges in completing health technology assessments (HTAs)/systematic reviews (SRs) in a timely manner. Software can decrease the time and burden by automating the process, but evidence validating such software is…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Software, Decision Making, Randomized Controlled Trials
Simpson, Adrian – Educational Researcher, 2019
A recent paper uses Bayes factors to argue a large minority of rigorous, large-scale education RCTs are "uninformative." The definition of "uninformative" depends on the authors' hypothesis choices for calculating Bayes factors. These arguably overadjust for effect size inflation and involve a fixed prior distribution,…
Descriptors: Randomized Controlled Trials, Bayesian Statistics, Educational Research, Program Evaluation
Pas, Elise T.; Johnson, Stacy R.; Debnam, Katrina J.; Hulleman, Chris S.; Bradshaw, Catherine P. – Remedial and Special Education, 2019
There are several widely used Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) implementation fidelity measures, including the Schoolwide Evaluation Tool (SET), but there is limited empirical investigation substantiating the association between specific fidelity cut point scores and student outcomes. This article examined different SET cut…
Descriptors: Positive Behavior Supports, Fidelity, Cutting Scores, Outcomes of Education