NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Madziva, Roda; Thondhlana, Juliet – Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 2017
While existing research has shown the importance of the three interrelated domains of the wider policy, the school and home/community environments in the development of quality education for learners, this literature does not fully capture the experiences of the refugee population. In this article we focus on a group of Syrian refugees who came as…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Educational Quality, Refugees, Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hummel, Hans G. K.; Joosten-ten Brinke, Desirée; Nadolski, Rob J.; Baartman, Liesbeth K. J. – Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 2017
Serious games foster the acquisition of complex problem-solving skills. Assessment of such skills should be in line with instruction, and within a serious game environment its content validity should equal face-to-face assessment. Research on assessment in serious gaming has remained rather scarce. This article shows how assessment can be…
Descriptors: Content Validity, Educational Games, Computer Games, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Campbell-Barr, Verity – European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 2012
This article is intended as a contribution to the debate on the role of human capital in determining value for money in early years education. The article explores how the idea that early years education offers value for money has become folklore amongst policymakers and more widely. However, drawing on both interview data and existing literature…
Descriptors: Human Capital, Cognitive Development, Interviews, Outcome Measures
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Reichardt, Charles S.; Cook, Thomas D. – Evaluation and Program Planning: An International Journal, 1980
How some of the past literature creates the impression of an inevitable method-paradigm linkage and of a forced choice between qualitative and quantitative paradigms is shown. Difficulties of making method choices are considered. It is suggested that purposefully developed strengths of different methods should not be ignored. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Evaluation Methods, Input Output Analysis, Interviews