NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
DeSanto, Dan; Nichols, Aaron – College & Research Libraries, 2017
This article presents the results of a faculty survey conducted at the University of Vermont during academic year 2014-2015. The survey asked faculty about: familiarity with scholarly metrics, metric-seeking habits, help-seeking habits, and the role of metrics in their department's tenure and promotion process. The survey also gathered faculty…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Teacher Surveys, Knowledge Level, Use Studies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ravesloot, C. J.; Van der Schaaf, M. F.; Muijtjens, A. M. M.; Haaring, C.; Kruitwagen, C. L. J. J.; Beek, F. J. A.; Bakker, J.; Van Schaik, J.P.J.; Ten Cate, Th. J. – Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2015
Formula scoring (FS) is the use of a don't know option (DKO) with subtraction of points for wrong answers. Its effect on construct validity and reliability of progress test scores, is subject of discussion. Choosing a DKO may not only be affected by knowledge level, but also by risk taking tendency, and may thus introduce construct-irrelevant…
Descriptors: Scoring Formulas, Tests, Scores, Construct Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Jancarík, Antonín; Kostelecká, Yvona – Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 2015
Electronic testing has become a regular part of online courses. Most learning management systems offer a wide range of tools that can be used in electronic tests. With respect to time demands, the most efficient tools are those that allow automatic assessment. The presented paper focuses on one of these tools: matching questions in which one…
Descriptors: Online Courses, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Items, Scoring Formulas
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hutchinson, T. P. – Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1980
In scoring multiple-choice tests, a score of 1 is given to right answers, 0 to unanswered questions, and some negative score to wrong answers. This paper discusses the relation of this negative score to the assumption made about the partial knowledge with the subjects may have. (Author/GDC)
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Knowledge Level, Multiple Choice Tests, Scoring Formulas
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Frary, Robert B. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1989
Multiple-choice response and scoring methods that attempt to determine an examinee's degree of knowledge about each item in order to produce a total test score are reviewed. There is apparently little advantage to such schemes; however, they may have secondary benefits such as providing feedback to enhance learning. (SLD)
Descriptors: Knowledge Level, Multiple Choice Tests, Scoring, Scoring Formulas
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Frary, Robert B. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1980
Six scoring methods for assigning weights to right or wrong responses according to various instructions given to test takers are analyzed with respect to expected change scores and the effect of various levels of information and misinformation. Three of the methods provide feedback to the test taker. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Knowledge Level, Multiple Choice Tests, Scores