NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fagan, Joseph F., III – Intelligence, 1981
Prior studies found individual differences in visual recognition memory during infancy were related to individual differences in later intelligence. This paper discusses methodological issues in the measurement of infant visual recognition, the significance of previously obtained predictive validity coefficients, and the theoretical question of…
Descriptors: Cognitive Measurement, Individual Differences, Infants, Intelligence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Banks, Martin S.; Salapatek, Philip – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1981
Presents results of two experiments which measured contrast sensitivity function in infants. Information concerning development of visual acuity, low frequency attenuation, and sensitivity to contrast were collected. Results provide an approximate picture of and means for detection of infants' pattern information. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Child Development, Infants, Pattern Recognition, Predictive Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lewis, Michael; Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne – Intelligence, 1981
The authors discuss methodological and theoretical issues in psychological investigations of infant attention, fixation times, habituation, and intelligence. A consensus on how to measure individual differences in habituation has not been reached. The relation between IQ and attention is discussed. (RD)
Descriptors: Attention, Cognitive Measurement, Individual Differences, Infants
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ashmore, Robert J.; Snyder, Robert T. – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1980
This paper presents evidence that the Snyder/Pope Visual Memory Technique using the Bender-Gestalt Test is a useful predictor of reading ability for first-grade children. Short-term visual recall appears highly related to the Grade 1 reading task and should be assessed when children begin learning to read. (Author/SJL)
Descriptors: Grade 1, Predictive Measurement, Predictor Variables, Primary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kramer, Gene A.; And Others – Journal of Dental Education, 1989
The construct and predictive validities of the Perceptual Ability Test (PAT) were examined. The results indicate that each of the subtests exhibits different predictive validity. A linear combination of PAT subtest scores was found to be more predictive of first-year dental school technique performance than the total PAT score. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Dental Schools, Dental Students, Dentistry
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fagan, Joseph F. – Intelligence, 1984
Theoretical implications of individual differences among infants in responsiveness to visual novelty being predictive of later intelligence differences are discussed. Issues discussed include: continuity of intelligence over development, relation of aspects of information processing to intelligence, role of hereditary and environmental influences…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Developmental Continuity, Individual Differences, Infants
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ottenbacher, Kenneth J. – Journal of Special Education, 1990
The agreement between visual analysis and the results of the split-middle method of trend estimation was examined using a set of 24 stimulus graphs and 30 raters. Results revealed poor agreement between the two methods, and low sensitivity, specificity, and predictive ability for visual analysis in relation to statistical inferences. (JDD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Estimation (Mathematics), Evaluation Methods, Graphs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pipp, Sandra; Haith, Marshall M. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1984
Visual fixations were recorded in newborn, 4-, and 8-week-old human infants as they scanned displays that varied in contour length, size, number, and a new metric, CVAL (based on Contour Variability, Amount and Location). One of the findings was that both contour length and CVAL separately accounted for approximatel1 95 of looking-duration…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Attention Span, Dimensional Preference, Eye Fixations