Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Critical Path Method | 3 |
Student Projects | 3 |
Engineering Education | 2 |
Models | 2 |
Assignments | 1 |
Bias | 1 |
Business Administration… | 1 |
Case Method (Teaching… | 1 |
Case Studies | 1 |
Cognitive Processes | 1 |
Computer Assisted Design | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Ballesteros-Pérez, Pablo | 1 |
Coppit, David | 1 |
González-Cruz, Maria C. | 1 |
Kalinski, Ray C. | 1 |
Larsen, Graeme D. | 1 |
Olson, Joel D. | 1 |
Ringhand, Darlene G. | 1 |
Ziegler, James G. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ballesteros-Pérez, Pablo; Larsen, Graeme D.; González-Cruz, Maria C. – Journal of Technology and Science Education, 2018
Many engineering projects fail to meet their planned completion dates in real practice. This is a recurrent topic in the project management literature, with poor planning and controlling practices frequently cited among the most significant causes of delays. Unfortunately, hardly any attention has been paid to the fact that the classical…
Descriptors: Program Administration, Student Projects, Scheduling, Engineering
Olson, Joel D.; Ringhand, Darlene G.; Kalinski, Ray C.; Ziegler, James G. – American Journal of Business Education, 2015
What is the best way to assign graduate business students to online team-based projects? Team assignments are frequently made on the basis of alphabet, time zones or previous performance. This study reviews personality as an indicator of student online team performance. The personality assessment IDE (Insights Discovery Evaluator) was administered…
Descriptors: Teamwork, Online Courses, Electronic Learning, Student Projects
Coppit, David – Computer Science Education, 2006
In software engineering education, large projects are widely recognized as a useful way of exposing students to the real-world difficulties of team software development. But large projects are difficult to put into practice. First, educators rarely have additional time to manage software projects. Second, classrooms have inherent limitations that…
Descriptors: Engineering Education, Teaching Methods, Organization Size (Groups), Critical Path Method