NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 31 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jonathan Hoseana; Andy Leonardo Louismono; Oriza Stepanus – International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 2025
We describe and evaluate a method to mitigate unwanted student collaborations in assessments, which we recently implemented in a second-year undergraduate mathematics module. The method requires a list of specific pairs of students to be prevented from collaborating, which we constructed based on the results of previous assessments. We converted…
Descriptors: Graphs, Color, College Mathematics, Undergraduate Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Li Zhao; Junjie Peng; Shiqi Ke; Kang Lee – Educational Psychology Review, 2024
Unproctored and teacher-proctored exams have been widely used to prevent cheating at many universities worldwide. However, no empirical studies have directly compared their effectiveness in promoting academic integrity in actual exams. To address this significant gap, in four preregistered field studies, we examined the effectiveness of…
Descriptors: Supervision, Tests, Testing, Integrity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Anna Filighera; Sebastian Ochs; Tim Steuer; Thomas Tregel – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2024
Automatic grading models are valued for the time and effort saved during the instruction of large student bodies. Especially with the increasing digitization of education and interest in large-scale standardized testing, the popularity of automatic grading has risen to the point where commercial solutions are widely available and used. However,…
Descriptors: Cheating, Grading, Form Classes (Languages), Computer Software
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Phillip Dawson; Kelli Nicola-Richmond; Helen Partridge – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024
Educators set restrictions in examinations to enable them to assess learning outcomes under particular conditions. The open book versus closed book binary is an example of the sorts of restrictions examiners have traditionally set. In the late 2000s this was expanded to a trinary to include open web examinations. However, the current technology…
Descriptors: Electronic Learning, Computer Assisted Testing, Supervision, Cheating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Benjamin Sorenson; Kenneth Hanson – Journal of Chemical Education, 2023
In spring 2020, the chemical education community faced an abrupt transition from in-person to online classes, which also necessitated online assessments. Building upon an existing three-semester study (F17, S19, and F19) using Rasch modeling and classical testing theory to improve in-person multiple choice exams, this study investigates the impact…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Study, Chemistry, COVID-19, Pandemics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kaveh Jalilzadeh; Mojgan Rashtchi; Fatemeh Mirzapour – Language Testing in Asia, 2024
A challenging aspect of online education is assessment since academic integrity could be violated due to students' cheating behaviors. The current qualitative research investigated English teachers' perceptions of why students cheat in online assessments. Besides, it attempted to find strategies to reduce cheating in online assessments. Twelve…
Descriptors: Cheating, Computer Assisted Testing, Coping, English (Second Language)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Gorney, Kylie; Wollack, James A. – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2022
Unlike the traditional multiple-choice (MC) format, the discrete-option multiple-choice (DOMC) format does not necessarily reveal all answer options to an examinee. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the reduced exposure of item content affects test security. We conducted an experiment in which participants were allowed to view…
Descriptors: Test Items, Test Format, Multiple Choice Tests, Item Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wise, Steven L. – Education Inquiry, 2019
A decision of whether to move from paper-and-pencil to computer-based tests is based largely on a careful weighing of the potential benefits of a change against its costs, disadvantages, and challenges. This paper briefly discusses the trade-offs involved in making such a transition, and then focuses on a relatively unexplored benefit of…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Cheating, Test Wiseness, Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Becker, Benjamin; van Rijn, Peter; Molenaar, Dylan; Debeer, Dries – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2022
A common approach to increase test security in higher educational high-stakes testing is the use of different test forms with identical items but different item orders. The effects of such varied item orders are relatively well studied, but findings have generally been mixed. When multiple test forms with different item orders are used, we argue…
Descriptors: Information Security, High Stakes Tests, Computer Security, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bretag, Tracey; Harper, Rowena; Burton, Michael; Ellis, Cath; Newton, Philip; van Haeringen, Karen; Saddiqui, Sonia; Rozenberg, Pearl – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2019
This paper reports on findings from a large Australian research project that explored the relationship between contract cheating and assessment design. Using survey responses from 14,086 students and 1147 educators at eight universities, a multivariate analysis examined the influence of a range of factors on the likelihood that different…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Cheating, College Students, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chirumamilla, Aparna; Sindre, Guttorm; Nguyen-Duc, Anh – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2020
A concern that has been raised with the transition from pen and paper examinations to electronic examinations is whether this will make cheating easier. This article investigates how teachers and students perceive the differences in ease of cheating during three types of written examination: paper exams, bring your own device e-exams and e-exams…
Descriptors: Cheating, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Format, Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Akkaraju, Shylaja – Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education, 2023
To reduce academic dishonesty and strengthen learning outcomes, I adopted in-depth oral examinations as my benchmark and summative assessments in a Human Anatomy & Physiology course taught in an online asynchronous setting. This decision led my students and me down the transformative path of mastery learning. This was a "threshold…
Descriptors: Cheating, Prevention, Oral Language, Test Format
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Behforouz, Behnam – Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 2022
The present study aimed to cover a holistic viewpoint toward assessment and its features. It discussed the problems in this area during the dominance of COVID-19. This study sought to present some notes on the current online assessment strategies used by the institutions. It measured the effects of the implemented techniques on the nature and…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Holistic Approach
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lewis, Scott E. – Journal of Chemical Education, 2020
This paper is designed to synopsize the efforts of a team of general chemistry teachers to enact assessments during the abrupt transition to online-only instruction and reflect on what was done successfully and what could be improved. The focus is on the extent remote, online assessments accurately measured student knowledge described within the…
Descriptors: Chemistry, Science Instruction, Online Courses, Distance Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Morales-Martinez, Guadalupe Elizabeth; Lopez-Ramirez, Ernesto Octavio; Mezquita-Hoyos, Yanko Norberto; Lopez-Perez, Rafael; Resendiz, Ana Yolanda Lara – European Journal of Educational Research, 2019
A sample of 327 engineering bachelor students from a public university in Mexico took part in an information integration study to explore systematic thinking underlying propensity for cheating during a course exam. All study participants were provided with written descriptions of 12 scenarios pertaining to the academic evaluation criteria and were…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Engineering Education, Cheating, Computer Assisted Testing
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3