Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Pretesting | 6 |
Testing Problems | 6 |
Higher Education | 3 |
Response Style (Tests) | 2 |
Achievement Tests | 1 |
Adults | 1 |
Alternative Assessment | 1 |
Attitude Change | 1 |
Attitude Measures | 1 |
Bias | 1 |
College Admission | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Applied Psychological… | 1 |
Atlantic | 1 |
Clearing House | 1 |
International Journal of… | 1 |
Journal of Experimental… | 1 |
Sociological Methods &… | 1 |
Author
Austin-Martin, George G. | 1 |
Fallows, James | 1 |
Hill, Laura G. | 1 |
Hoogstraten, Joh. | 1 |
Palmieri, Marco | 1 |
Schuncke, George M. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Opinion Papers | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Italy (Rome) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Palmieri, Marco – Sociological Methods & Research, 2020
The researcher, who pretests a questionnaire conventionally, is confident that a small number of interviews reveals numerous problems afflict the questionnaire. The standardized interviewer is asked to observe respondent's verbal behaviors in order to realize whether respondent misunderstands question. But this strategy fails when respondent does…
Descriptors: Questionnaires, Pretesting, Testing Problems, Interviews
Hill, Laura G. – International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2020
Retrospective pretests ask respondents to report after an intervention on their aptitudes, knowledge, or beliefs before the intervention. A primary reason to administer a retrospective pretest is that in some situations, program participants may over the course of an intervention revise or recalibrate their prior understanding of program content,…
Descriptors: Pretesting, Response Style (Tests), Bias, Testing Problems

Schuncke, George M. – Clearing House, 1981
Examines two common errors in evaluation and ways to circumvent them. The first error is faulty pretesting or diagnostic evaluation. The second is failure to monitor student progress and plan instruction in relation to the specified learning goals. (SJL)
Descriptors: Diagnostic Teaching, Elementary Secondary Education, Formative Evaluation, Informal Assessment

Hoogstraten, Joh. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1979
The biasing effects of a pretest on subsequent post-test results were investigated in two experimental studies. In general, the results argue for using designs without pretests. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Control Groups, Error Patterns, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education

Austin-Martin, George G. – Journal of Experimental Education, 1979
The effects of student teaching and the pretesting of attitudes on student teachers' attitudes were studied. Results suggested that pretesting of attitudes was detrimental to attitude improvement. Appropriate designs for assessing changes in attitudes were discussed. (Author/MH)
Descriptors: Attitude Change, Attitude Measures, Dogmatism, Education Majors
Fallows, James – Atlantic, 1980
The role of standardized tests in American education is being challenged as many feel that they are unfair and actually reinforce and legitimize existing inequalities. The Educational Testing Service, the SAT, meritocracy, test coaching, and economic bias are discussed. (MLW)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, College Admission, College Entrance Examinations, Family Income