Descriptor
Source
| Reading Horizons | 3 |
| Reading Teacher | 3 |
| Topics in Language Disorders | 3 |
| Journal of Consulting and… | 2 |
| Journal of Research in Reading | 2 |
| Reading | 1 |
| Reading Psychology | 1 |
| Reading World | 1 |
Author
| Venable, Gail Portnuff | 2 |
| Allington, Richard | 1 |
| Anderson, Jonathan | 1 |
| Berndt, David J. | 1 |
| Danielson, Kathy Everts | 1 |
| Dentch, Gail E. | 1 |
| Green, D. R. | 1 |
| Koenke, Karl | 1 |
| Lange, Bob | 1 |
| McKenna, Michael C. | 1 |
| Popham, W. James | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 16 |
| Information Analyses | 6 |
| Reports - Research | 6 |
| ERIC Publications | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 2 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedKoenke, Karl – Reading Teacher, 1987
Looks at ERIC documents that deal with readability concerns. (FL)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Readability, Readability Formulas, Reading Instruction
Peer reviewedBerndt, David J.; And Others – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1983
Obtained reading grade levels for depression scales by use of two empirically based readability formulae. Results showed Kovacs children's measure had the easiest reading level, the General Behavior Inventory was appropriate for college-level reading, and most other measures clustered at a fifth- to ninth-grade reading level. (WAS)
Descriptors: Affective Measures, Depression (Psychology), Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewedAnderson, Jonathan – Journal of Research in Reading, 1983
Reports a number of modifications to the computer readability program STAR (Simple Tests Approach to Readability) designed to make it more useful. (FL)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Content Analysis, Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewedStahl, Steven A. – Topics in Language Disorders, 2003
This article explores the relationships between vocabulary knowledge and text readability. It discusses how procedures used by readability formulas to assess the vocabulary factor can over- or underestimate text difficulty by counting syllables rather than assessing what the reader knows about the words in a text. (Contains references.) (Author/CR)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Language Impairments, Performance Factors
Peer reviewedVenable, Gail Portnuff – Topics in Language Disorders, 2003
These exercises and examples pertain to readability information presented in preceding articles. They are designed to help speech language pathologists test their intuitions about word and text difficulty and to see readability data from a number of quantitative formulas applied to passages across a wide range of levels. (Contains 8 references.)…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Language Impairments, Readability
Peer reviewedVenable, Gail Portnuff – Topics in Language Disorders, 2003
Examples are provided that show readability in action in diverse settings. The first shows how readability analysis resulted in a new fluency monitoring protocol in three school districts in Northern California. The others present hypothetical school, clinic, and research situations that a speech language pathologist might encounter. (Author/CR)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Language Impairments
Peer reviewedWilliamson, John – Reading, 1986
Reports on a study that examined the readability of a selection of C. S. E. papers taken from six subject areas. Found that, with the exception of that given in history, the exams did not make excessive demands on the candidates' reading skills. (FL)
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Readability, Reading Research, Secondary Education
Peer reviewedDanielson, Kathy Everts – Reading Horizons, 1987
Lists the dangers of readability formulas and concludes that while they may be a necessary evil, they should not be used as the underlying structure of a reading program. (FL)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Readability Formulas, Reading Comprehension, Reading Instruction
Peer reviewedDentch, Gail E.; And Others – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1980
All of the measures require greater reading capability than tests like the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory that are designed for use with diverse clinical populations. Unfortunately, some important measures based on promising social-learning conceptualizations of marital conflict were among the more difficult. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Modification, Behavior Rating Scales, Clinical Psychology, Marriage Counseling
Peer reviewedPopham, W. James – Reading Horizons, 1982
Details the steps followed in the development of the Basic Skills Word List. (FL)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Readability, Reading Tests, Test Construction
Peer reviewedSmith, Lawrence L. – Reading Horizons, 1984
Describes two modifications to the SMOG Readability Formula designed to make it more useful for primary and intermediate grade materials. (FL)
Descriptors: Intermediate Grades, Primary Education, Readability Formulas, Reading Comprehension
Peer reviewedLange, Bob – Reading Teacher, 1982
Examines the arguments against the indiscriminate use of readability formulas. (FL)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods, Readability Formulas, Reading Diagnosis
Peer reviewedGreen, D. R.; Tomlinson, M. – Journal of Research in Reading, 1983
Confirms that in cloze testing, it is unnecessary to use standard size spaces and reveals a high correlation between synonymic scoring and verbatim scoring. Indicates also that a specific probability concepts test is comprehensible and readable by the great majority of students for whom it was devised. (FL)
Descriptors: Cloze Procedure, Elementary Secondary Education, Listening Skills, Probability
Peer reviewedMcKenna, Michael C. – Reading Teacher, 1983
Reviews the literature concerning informal reading inventories and discusses a number of issues related to them, including question choice, scoring criteria, and allowable miscues. Offers guidelines for constructing and using the inventories. (FL)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Informal Reading Inventories, Readability, Reading Ability
Peer reviewedWalmsley, Sean A.; Allington, Richard – Reading Psychology, 1980
Considers three issues related to the conduct of research into reading problems of the elderly: (1) the lack of federal funding of literacy research concerning the elderly, (2) differences between conducting research with school-aged populations and with the elderly, and (3) problems encountered in testing elderly individuals. (GT)
Descriptors: Federal Government, Financial Support, Government Publications, Older Adults
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2

